In reply to Philip Johnson-Laird's What's Wrong with Grandma's Guide to Procedural Semantics: A Reply to Jerry Fodor
Graduate studies at Western
Cognition 7 (March):93-95 (1979)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||Language Semantics Johnson-laird, P|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1983). A Computational Analysis of Consciousness. Cognition and Brain Theory 6:499-508.
Jerry Fodor & Ernie LePore (2005). Impossible Words: A Reply to Kent Johnson. Mind and Language 20 (3):353–356.
Lance J. Rips (1997). Goals for a Theory of Deduction: Reply to Johnson-Laird. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 7 (3):409-424.
P. N. Johnson-Laird & Ruth M. J. Byrne (1999). Models Rule, OK? A Reply to Fetzer. Minds and Machines 9 (1):111-118.
Jerry A. Fodor (1978). Tom Swift and His Procedural Grandmother. Cognition 6 (September):229-47.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1994). Reply to the Commentators on a Model Theory of Induction. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8 (1):73 – 96.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1997). An End to the Controversy? A Reply to Rips. Minds and Machines 7 (3):425-432.
Guy Politzer (2009). Could It Be the Case That If I Am Right My Opponents Will Be Pleased? A Rejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Byrne and Girotto. Topoi 28 (1):81-85.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1977). Procedural Semantics. Cognition 5:189-214.
Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1978). What's Wrong with Grandma's Guide to Procedural Semantics: A Reply to Jerry Fodor. Cognition 9 (September):249-61.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?