Special Sciences, or Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis
Graduate studies at Western
Synthese 28 (2):97--115 (1974)
|Abstract||This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. A. Fodor (1974). Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis). Synthese 28 (2):97-115.
Alison Wylie (1999). Rethinking Unity as a "Working Hypothesis" for Philosophy: How Archaeologists Exploit the Disunities of Science. Perspectives on Science 7 (3):293-317.
Barry Loewer (2009). Why is There Anything Except Physics? Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.
Terence Horgan & John Tienson (1998). Resisting the Tyranny of Terminology: The General Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):643-643.
Alexander Reutlinger (2011). A Theory of Non-Universal Laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
Jennifer Radden (2003). Learning From Disunity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (4):357-359.
Alexander Rosenberg (1994). Instrumental Biology, or, the Disunity of Science. University of Chicago Press.
Mathias Frisch (2011). From Arbuthnot to Boltzmann: The Past Hypothesis, the Best System, and the Special Sciences. Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1001-1011.
RW Batterman (2000). Multiple Realizability and Universality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):115-145.
Robert M. French & Elizabeth Thomas (1998). The Dynamical Hypothesis: One Battle Behind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):640-641.
Steve Clarke (2004). Ontological Disunity and a Realism Worth Having. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):628-629.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-08-21
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?