The dogma that didn't bark (a fragment of a naturalized epistemology)
Mind 100 (2):201-220 (1991)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | observation, data, theory, theory laden-ness | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul M. Churchland (1988). Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality: A Reply to Jerry Fodor. Philosophy of Science 55 (June):167-87.
William A. Rottschaefer (1976). Observation: Theory-Laden, Theory-Neutral or Theory-Free? Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):499-509.
Bruce Glymour (2000). Data and Phenomena: A Distinction Reconsidered. Erkenntnis 52 (1):29-37.
Anna Estany (2001). The Thesis of Theory-Laden Observation in the Light of Cognitive Psychology. Philosophy of Science 68 (2):203-217.
Hangqing Cong & Xiaodong Cheng (2006). Pragmatic Commitments to Naturalized Epistemology. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):477-490.
Harold I. Brown (1987). Observation And Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
Jerry A. Fodor (1984). Observation Reconsidered. Philosophy of Science 51 (March):23-43.
Michael Dickson (1999). The Light at the End of the Tunneling: Observation and Underdetermination. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):58.
William F. Brewer & Bruce L. Lambert (2001). The Theory-Ladenness of Observation and the Theory-Ladenness of the Rest of the Scientific Process. Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S176-S186.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads52 ( #20,449 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,489 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
