David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (1994)
This work, written from a neo-Pyrrhonian perspective, is an examination of contemporary theories of knowledge and justification. It takes ideas primarily found in Sextus Empiricus's Outlines of Pyrrhonism, restates them in a modern idiom, and then asks whether any contemporary theory of knowledge meets the challenges they raise. The first part, entitled "Gettier and the Problem of Knowledge," attempts to rescue our ordinary concept of knowledge from those philosophers who have assigned burdens to it that it cannot bear. Properly understood, Fogelin shows that the concept of knowledge is unproblematic. The second part of this study, called "Agrippa and the Problem of Justification," examines Agrippa's contribution to Pyrrhonism, a systematic reduction of its procedures which came to be known as the "Five Modes Leading to the Suspension of Belief." These modes present a completely general procedure for refuting any claim a dogmatist might make. Though largely unnoticed, there is, according to Fogelin, an uncanny resemblance between problems posed by Agrippa's "Five Modes" and those that contemporary epistemologists address under the heading of a theory of justification. Fogelin examines the strongest contemporary theories of justification--in both foundationalist and anti-foundationalist forms. The conclusion is that recent philosophical writings on justification have made no significant progress in responding to the Pyrrhonian problems these writings have addressed.
|Keywords||Justification (Theory of knowledge Skepticism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$83.72 used (46% off) $103.78 new (34% off) $155.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||BD212.F64 1994|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Mikkel Gerken (2012). Discursive Justification and Skepticism. Synthese 189 (2):373-394.
Ram Neta (2003). Contextualism and the Problem of the External World. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):1–31.
Sven Bernecker (2011). Keeping Track of the Gettier Problem. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):127-152.
Tad Brennan & Jongsuh Lee (2014). A Relative Improvement. Phronesis 59 (3):246-271.
Diego E. Machuca (2011). Ancient Skepticism: Pyrrhonism. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):246-258.
Similar books and articles
Robert J. Fogelin (1997). Review: Précis of Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (2):395 - 400.
Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Blackwell Pub..
B. J. C. Madison (2010). Is Justification Knowledge? Journal of Philosophical Research 35:173-191.
William Harper (1998). Papier Mâché Problems in Epistemology: A Defense of Strong Internalism. Synthese 116 (1):27-49.
George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.) (1978). Essays on Knowledge and Justification. Cornell University Press.
Keith Lehrer (2000). Theory of Knowledge. Westview Press.
Michael Williams (1999). Fogelin's Neo-Pyrrhonism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):141 – 158.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads87 ( #47,425 of 1,796,224 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #60,326 of 1,796,224 )
How can I increase my downloads?