Graduate studies at Western
Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (3):289-302 (1983)
|Abstract||This essay attempts to elucidate and restate in modern terms richard price's reduction of our obligation to keep promises to our obligation to veracity. It next defends this reduction against standard criticisms. This defence is, However, Limited, Since the voluntarists (descartes) and the utility theorists (hume), Whom price is most anxious to refute, Could accept this reduction and reassert their theories with respect to our obligation to veracity itself|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas L. Carson (2005). The Morality of Bluffing: A Reply to Allhoff. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 56 (4):399 - 403.
Richard Otte (2004). Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
Terence E. Horgan (2006). Materialism: Matters of Definition, Defense, and Deconstruction. Philosophical Studies 131 (1):157-83.
Justin P. McBrayer (2010). A Limited Defense of Moral Perception. Philosophical Studies 149 (3):305–320.
Kenneth Shockley (2008). On That Peculiar Practice of Promising. Philosophical Studies 140 (3):385 - 399.
Margaret A. Crouch (1993). A "Limited" Defense of the Genetic Fallacy. Metaphilosophy 24 (3):227-240.
Richard Feldman (1992). Reason and Morality: A Defense of the Egocentric Perspective, by Richard Fumerton. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):989-993.
Steven F. Savitt (2001). A Limited Defense of Passage. American Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):261 - 270.
Richard Price (1991). Political Writings. Cambridge University Press.
Francisco J. Vázquez & Richard Watt (2002). The Price of Risk with Incomplete Knowledge on the Utility Function. Theory and Decision 53 (3):271-287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,764 of 754,495 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?