Constructive Thoughts on Pierre Menard

Philosophy and Literature 35 (2):338-347 (2011)
Interpretational monists and pluralists most often accept contextualism. At the same time, most of them resist constructivism, which takes all interpretations of artworks to be separate artworks. However, one of the central arguments to establish contextualism, based on Borges’ story of Pierre Menard, is so formulated that using it can force all contextualists into accepting constructivism. This paper points out the under-specification present in the philosophical use of the Pierre Menard example to then combine it with arguments presented by contextualists themselves and show that without a more careful look at the example discussed, accepting all those arguments entails constructivism.
Keywords aesthetics  interpretation  contextualism  constructivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Jorge J. E. Gracia (2001). Borges's "Pierre Menard": Philosophy or Literature? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59 (1):45-57.
    William Tait (2006). Godel's Interpretation of Intuitionism. Philosophia Mathematica 14 (2):208-228.
    James O. Young (2010). Art and the Educated Audience. Journal of Aesthetic Education 44 (3):29-42.

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index


    Total downloads

    33 ( #44,428 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    12 ( #9,280 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature

    Start a new thread
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.