David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:77 - 88 (1990)
According to the naturalistic normative axiology of Laudan's reticulated model of scientific change, empirical discoveries in the advance of science can provide a rational basis for axiological decisions concerning which epistemic goals scientific inquiry ought to pursue. The Bohr-Einstein debate over acceptance of quantum theory is analyzed as a case of axiological change. The participants' aims are incompatible due to different formulations of the goal of objective description, but neither doubts the realist commitment to the existence of microsystems or the intention of quantum mechanics to provide knowledge of them. Thus the general aim of realism is not at issue.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicolaas P. Landsman (2006). When Champions Meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein Debate. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):212-242.
Howard Sankey (1996). Normative Naturalism and the Challenge of Relativism: Laudan Versus Worrall on the Justification of Methodological Principles. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):37 – 51.
Jarrett Leplin (1990). Renormalizing Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 57 (1):20-33.
Alisa Bokulich (2008). Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate. Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114.
Towfic Shomar (2008). Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 39 (2):321 - 349.
Manjit Kumar (2009). Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality. Hachette India.
David Resnik (1994). Repairing the Reticulated Model of Scientific Rationality. Erkenntnis 40 (3):343 - 355.
Dugald Murdoch (1987). Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy D. Lyons (2011). The Problem of Deep Competitors and the Pursuit of Epistemically Utopian Truths. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42 (2):317-338.
Paul M. Clark (ed.) (1981). Modern Physics and Problems of Knowledge. Open University Press.
Timothy D. Lyons (2005). Toward a Purely Axiological Scientific Realism. Erkenntnis 63 (2):167 - 204.
John Honner (1987). The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Oxford University Press.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Jan Faye (2010). Niels Bohr and the Vienna Circle. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 14:33-45.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #249,497 of 1,413,490 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #155,015 of 1,413,490 )
How can I increase my downloads?