Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (2):217-239 (2008)
|Abstract||There are a number of different senses of the term “evil.” We examine in this paper the term “evil” when it is used to say things such as: “what Hitler did was not merely wrong, it was evil”, and “Hitler was not merely a bad person, he was an evil person”. Failing to keep a promise or telling a white lie may be morally wrong, but unlike genocide or sadistic torture, it is not evil in this sense. In this paper we analyze the specific moral difference between “evil” and “mere wrongdoing”. In so doing we shall defend a specific conception of what acts and which persons should count as evil. On the view defended in this paper it is a necessary feature of an evil act that the victim of that act suffer what would at least normally be a life-wrecking or life-ending harm.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nick Trakakis (2005). Is Theism Capable of Accounting for Any Natural Evil at All? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (1):35 - 66.
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter (De Mal. Subs. 30-7 ). Phronesis 46 (2):154-188.
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter ("De Mal. Subs." 30-7). Phronesis 46 (2):154 - 188.
Lars Fr H. Svendsen (2010). A Philosophy of Evil. Dalkey Archive Press.
Franklin Perkins (2006). Reproaching Heaven: The Problem of Evil in Mengzi. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (2):293-312.
Jerome A. Miller (2009). The Trauma of Evil and the Traumatological Conception of Forgiveness. Continental Philosophy Review 42 (3):401-419.
Paul Formosa (2007). Is Radical Evil Banal? Is Banal Evil Radical? Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735.
Michael Gelven (1998). This Side of Evil. Marquette University Press.
Paul Formosa (2007). Understanding Evil Acts. Human Studies 30 (2):57 - 77.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,541 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?