Graduate studies at Western
Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):89-105 (2008)
|Abstract||Software agents’ ability to interact within different open systems, designed by different groups, presupposes an agreement on an unambiguous definition of a set of concepts, used to describe the context of the interaction and the communication language the agents can use. Agents’ interactions ought to allow for reliable expectations on the possible evolution of the system; however, in open systems interacting agents may not conform to predefined specifications. A possible solution is to define interaction environments including a normative component, with suitable rules to regulate the behaviour of agents. To tackle this problem we propose an application-independent metamodel of artificial institutions that can be used to define open multiagent systems. In our view an artificial institution is made up by an ontology that models the social context of the interaction, a set of authorizations to act on the institutional context, a set of linguistic conventions for the performance of institutional actions and a system of norms that are necessary to constrain the agents’ actions.|
|Keywords||Artificial institutions Open systems Norms Conventions Commitments|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Guido Boella & Leendert van der Torre (2007). The Ontological Properties of Social Roles in Multi-Agent Systems: Definitional Dependence, Powers and Roles Playing Roles. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (3):201-221.
Vincenzo Tagliasco, Towards an Artificial User: The “What” Problem for an Architecture Capable of Developing New Goals.
Antonio Argandoña (2004). Economic Ethics and Institutional Change. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):191-201.
Giacomo Cabri, Luca Ferrari & Rossella Rubino (2008). Building Computational Institutions for Agents with Rolex. Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):129-145.
Robert A. Gehring (2006). The Institutionalization of Open Source. Poiesis and Praxis 4 (1):54-73.
Francesco Amigoni & Viola Schiaffonati (2008). A Multiagent Approach to Modelling Complex Phenomena. Foundations of Science 13 (2):113-125.
Henrique Lopes Cardoso & Eugénio Oliveira (2008). Electronic Institutions for B2b: Dynamic Normative Environments. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):107 - 128.
Porfirio Silva & Pedro U. Lima (2007). Institutional Robotics. In F. Almeida e Costa et al (ed.), Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2007. Springer-Verlag.
Munindar P. Singh (1999). An Ontology for Commitments in Multiagent Systems:. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):97-113.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?