David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Theory and Practice 34 (2):157-181 (2008)
Kant argues that morals should not only constrain politics, but that morals and politics properly understood cannot conflict. Such an uncompromising stance on the relation of morals to politics has been branded unrealistic and even politically irresponsible. While justice can afford to be blind, politics must keep its eyes wide open. In response to this charge I argue that Kant’s position on the relation of morals to politics is both morally uncompromising and yet politically flexible, both principled and practical. Kantian justice is not blind to circumstances, and we need not abandon our convictions in order to be politically responsible. Indeed, Kant argues that future political progress can only be achieved when the coerced rule of right is coupled with the non-coerced rule of virtue. For Kant, freedom and justice are intertwined with publicity, and publicity depends upon the critical acumen and moral candour of an enlightened and virtuous citizenry.
|Keywords||Kant Morality Politics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Margit Ruffing (2010). Kant-Bibliographie 2008. Kant-Studien 101 (4):487-538.
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Sandel (2009). Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do? Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Edgar Frederick[From Old Catalog] Carritt (1935). Morals and Politics: Theories of Their Relation From Hobbes and Spinoza to Marx and Bosanquet. Oxford, the Clarendon Press.
G. P. Gooch (1935). Politics and Morals; Merttens Lecture, 1935. London, L. And Virginia Woolf at the Hogarth Press.
J. H. Tufts (1935). Book Review:Morals and Politics: Theories of Their Relation From Hobbes and Spinoza to Marx and Bosanquet. E. F. Carritt. [REVIEW] Ethics 45 (4):448-.
Claudia M. Schmidt (2005). The Anthropological Dimension of Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Kant-Studien 96 (1):66-84.
James DiCenso (2011). Kant, Religion, and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
A. K. Bierman (1972). On the Relation Between Politics and Morals. Journal of Social Philosophy 3 (2):8-11.
Marguerite La Caze (2007). At the Intersection: Kant, Derrida, and the Relation Between Ethics and Politics. Political Theory 35 (6):781 - 805.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #99,014 of 1,102,883 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #62,002 of 1,102,883 )
How can I increase my downloads?