Graduate studies at Western
The European Legacy 17 (2):185 - 196 (2012)
|Abstract||Paradise Lost can be read on various levels, some of which challenge or even contradict others. The main, explicit narrative from Genesis chapters 2 and 3 is shadowed by many other related stories. Some of these buried tales question or subvert the values made explicit in the dominant narrative. An attentive reader needs to be alert to the ways in which such references introduce teasing complexities. The approach of Satan to Eve in the ninth book of Paradise Lost is loaded in just that way with allusion to the literature of Greece and Rome. The poem recovers for this long and intricately constructed passage the weight of classical reference, especially in similes, that it had during the first Satanic books. Gardens, both classical and biblical, disguised or transformed serpents, and the weight of allusions that Eve is required to bear, all threaten to undermine the meanings of the overt narrative. The narrator has difficulty rescuing Eve from the allusions she attracts, or the many stories told about her|
|Keywords||Satan allusion gardens Milton|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Margaret Olofson Thickstun (2007). Milton's Paradise Lost: Moral Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
R. Mayer (2003). A Lost Allusion Recovered: Tacitus, Histories 3.37.1 and Homer, Iliad 19.301-2. The Classical Quarterly 53 (1):313-315.
Warren Chernaik (2012). Areopagitica: 'The Known Rules of Antient Libertie'. The European Legacy 17 (3):317 - 331.
Ursula Phillips (2012). Epic Poem or Adaptation to Catholic Doctrine? Two Polish Versions of Paradise Lost. The European Legacy 17 (3):349 - 365.
Martin Brady (2004). Allusion in the Heroides J.-C. Jolivet: Allusion Et Fiction Épistolaire Dans Les Héroïdes. Recherches Sur l'Intertextualité Ovidienne . (Collection de l'École Française de Rome 289.) Pp. X + 356. Rome: École Française de Rome, 2001. Paper. Isbn: 2-7283-0561-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 54 (01):98-.
Nicholas Horsfall (1993). Allusion in the Georgics Joseph Farrell: Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic. The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Pp. Xiv + 390. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. £30. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (01):44-47.
Noam Reisner (2009). Milton and the Ineffable. OUP Oxford.
Jan Marten Ivo Klaver (2007). Destabilizing Milton: 'Paradise Lost' and the Poetics of Incertitude. By Peter C. Herman. Heythrop Journal 48 (5):804–805.
K. W. Gransden (1994). Milton and the Classics William M. Porter: Reading The Classics and Paradise Lost. Pp.Xii + 222. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press, 1993.£8.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 44 (02):389-390.
John F. Huntley (1966). The Ecology and Anatomy of Criticism: Milton's Sonnet 19 and the Bee Simile in "Paradise Lost," I. 768-76. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 24 (3):383-391.
Jason Philip Rosenblatt (1996). Book Review: Torah and Law in "Paradise Lost". [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 20 (2).
Gordon Teskey (1996). Book Review: Torah and Law in "Paradise Lost&Quot. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 20 (2):546-548.
Wendy C. Hamblet (2004). Paradise Lost and the Question of Legitimacy. Ratio 17 (1):45–59.
Added to index2012-03-09
Total downloads2 ( #246,694 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?