Clarembald of Arras as a Boethian Commentator
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Thomas Jefferson University Press (1995)
Clarembald of Arras, a twelfth-century ecclesiastical official and schoolmaster, composed glosses on two of the Boethian Opuscula Sacra and a commentary on the hexameron. While he acknowledged his study of Boethius under his masters Thierry of Chartres and Hugh of St. Victor, his dependence on the former is significant: he borrowed heavily from Thierry, following not only his basic doctrinal interpretation of the Boethian treatises but also repeating entire passages from Thierry's glosses. ;The question arises then: is Clarembald to be considered as nothing more than an imitator of the thought of Thierry? Is he to be understood simply as a "typical Chartrian"? Is his interest in the Boethian opuscula confined to restatements of Thierry's interpretations and entirely lacking in any other purposes or qualities that are peculiarly his own? ;A careful reading of the Clarembaldian corpus does indeed present a strong case for the dependence of Clarembald upon Thierry in thought and expression. Yet he composed his De Trinitate gloss at the request of others, even though Thierry's was available, indicating something of Clarembald's standing in the academic community. Further there is substantial evidence in his writings of a distinct measure of independence from Thierry. This is to be found in part in Clarembald's careful contextualization of each work and again in his utilization of sources unknown to Thierry. The most prominent feature of independence is found in Clarembald's intention or purpose in writing his own glosses and the hexameron: Clarembald's works have a certain polemical and apologetic orientation, particularly in regard to Gilbert of Poitiers, Peter Abelard and the Cathars, an orientation not found as such in Thierry's works. ;A careful examination of the texts shows Clarembald to be indeed a scholar of some merit in his research and in the expression of his thought. His intentions and purposes in writing go beyond an imitation of Thierry: he used the glosses to confront dogmatic issues of the day, giving him his own unique place in the tradition of Boethian commentators and in the intellectual history of the middle ages
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$36.50 direct from Amazon $662.16 used $1013.18 new Amazon page|
|Call number||B659.Z7.F67 1995|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ivor Bulmer-Thomas (1985). Boethian Number Theory Michael Masi: Boethian Number Theory: A Translation of the De Institutione Arithmetica (with Introduction and Notes). (Studies in Classical Antiquity, 6.) Pp. 198; 8 Figures with Mathematical Diagrams and Musical Notation in Text. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi, 1983. Paper, Fl. 60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):86-87.
Siobhan Nash Marshall (2003). The Boethian Commentaries of Clarembald of Arras. International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (4):558-559.
Richard A. Dwyer (1976). Boethian Fictions: Narratives in the Medieval French Versions of the Consolatio Philosophiae. Mediaeval Academy of America.
Maartje Schermer & Jozef Keulartz (2003). Pragmatism as a Research Program – a Reply to Arras. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (1):19-29.
Noel Harold Kaylor, Philip Edward Phillips & Boethius (eds.) (2007). New Directions in Boethian Studies. Medieval Institute Publications.
Jerold C. Frakes (ed.) (1988). The Fate of Fortune in the Early Middle Ages: The Boethian Tradition. E.J. Brill.
Toivo J. Holopainen (2007). Anselm's Argumentum and the Early Medieval Theory of Argument. Vivarium 45 (1):1-29.
John Arras & Elizabeth Fenton (2010). Arras and Fenton Reply. Hastings Center Report 40 (3):5-6.
R. Macken (1984). Denys the Carthusian, Commentator on Boethius's "De Consolatione Philosophiae". Institut Für Anglistik Und Amerikanistik, Universität Salzburg.
Catherine Jack Deavel (2004). The Boethian Commentaries of Clarembald of Arras. Review of Metaphysics 58 (1):173-174.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?