Conceptual Role Semantics and Naturalizing Meaning

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (24):337-348 (2008)
In this paper I will do three things. One, to explain why conceptual role semantics seems an attractive theory of meaning (I). Two, to sketch a version of it which has a good chance of withstanding some of the standard objections (II-III). Three, to see what follows from this version with respect to the naturalization of meaning (IV)
Keywords conceptual role  externalism  holisk
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI croatjphil2008835
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Gabor Forrai, Conceptual Role Semantics and Naturalizing Meaning
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Hartry Field (1977). Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role. Journal of Philosophy 74 (July):379-409.
Brian Loar (1982). Conceptual Role and Truth Conditions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (July):272-83.
Ned Block (1986). Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10 (1):615-78.
Daniel Whiting (2006). Conceptual Role Semantics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

211 ( #16,026 of 1,940,976 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

17 ( #40,325 of 1,940,976 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.