David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Clinical Ethics 7 (1):45-50 (2012)
If ethics consultation services influence medical decisions it is important to evaluate how ethical dilemmas are dealt with by clinical ethics committees (CECs). Such evaluation is rare. This study presents a feasible and practical method of evaluating case discussions in CECs and the results emerging from the use of this method. A written presentation of an end-of-life dilemma was sent to all Norwegian ethics committees. The committees were asked to deal with the case as they would do if it was a real case, and to prepare a written report of the discussion. A majority of the committees approached the case systematically. All emphasized the importance of good communication with the next of kin. However, their conclusions varied, medical facts were interpreted differently, possible patient suffering was dealt with differently, and some committees revealed insufficient legal knowledge. Such findings are useful in the future education of committee members
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Morten Magelssen, Reidar Pedersen & Reidun Førde (2016). Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. HEC Forum 28 (3):205-216.
Similar books and articles
Reidar Pedersen, Victoria Akre & Reidun Førde (2009). Barriers and Challenges in Clinical Ethics Consultations: The Experiences of Nine Clinical Ethics Committees. Bioethics 23 (8):460-469.
R. Pedersen, S. A. Hurst, J. Schildmann, S. Schuster & B. Molewijk (2010). The Development of a Descriptive Evaluation Tool for Clinical Ethics Case Consultations. Clinical Ethics 5 (3):136-141.
Tanja Ramsauer & Andreas Frewer (2009). Clinical Ethics Committees and Pediatrics. An Evaluation of Case Consultations. Diametros 22:90 – 104.
Jean-Claude Chevrolet & Bara Ricou (2009). Hospital Clinical Ethics Committees. The Geneva Experience - Switzerland. Diametros 22:21-38.
R. Pedersen, V. Akre & R. Forde (2009). What is Happening During Case Deliberations in Clinical Ethics Committees? A Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):147-152.
David C. Thomasma (1991). Why Philosophers Should Offer Ethics Consultations. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Eleanor Updale (2009). The Role of Clinical Ethics Committees. Diametros 22:116-123.
Paul J. Ford & Denise M. Dudzinski (eds.) (2008). Complex Ethics Consultations: Cases That Haunt Us. Cambridge University Press.
Andreas Vieth (2011). Inclusive Consultation: A Hermeneutical Approach to Ethical Deliberation in the Clinical Setting. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 23 (4):295-304.
John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer (1991). The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
George J. Agich (2009). The Issue of Expertise in Clinical Ethics. Diametros 22:3-20.
Vic Larcher (2009). The Development and Function of Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) in the United Kingdom. Diametros 22:47-63.
Linda Farber Post (2007). Handbook for Health Care Ethics Committees. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Peter Singer, Edmund Pellegrino & Mark Siegler (2001). Clinical Ethics Revisited. BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-8.
Marek Czarkowski (2006). The Protection of Patients' Rights in Clinical Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):131-138.
Added to index2012-05-31
Total downloads83 ( #53,818 of 1,934,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #48,478 of 1,934,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?