In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):105 - 122 (2011)
I reply to seven objections to anthropomorphic theism: (1) That anthropomorphic theism is idolatrous. In reply I rely on the concept/conception distinction. (2) That faith requires certainty. In reply I argue that full belief may be based on probable inference. (3) That the truly infinite is incomprehensible. In reply I distinguish two senses of knowing what you mean. (4) "You Kant say that!" In reply I distinguish shallow from deep Kantianism. (5) "Shall Old Aquinas be forgot?" In reply I discuss the simplicity of God. (6) What those garrulous mystics say about the ineffable. In reply I argue that mystics should be anthropomorphites. (7) Antitheodicy. In reply I distinguish the community of all agents from the community of finite frail agents
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Illyd Trethowan (1966). In Defence of Theism: A Reply to Kai Nielsen. Religious Studies 2 (1):37 - 48.
Jeff Snapper (2011). Paying the Cost of Skeptical Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):45-56.
Peter Forrest (1996). Physicalism and Classical Theism. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):179-200.
Clement Dore (1986). A Reply to Professor Rowe. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):314-318.
Piotr Sikora (2010). Ateism, Agnosticism, and Apothatic Theism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):65-80.
N. N. Trakakis (2010). Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest. Sophia 49 (1):129-140.
W. Barnett Pearce (1979). Toward an Anthropomorphic Social Science: A Reply to Levine and to Rosser and Harré. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 9 (1):117–121.
Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.) (2012). The Routledge Companion to Theism. Routledge.
Graham Oppy (2005). Evidential Arguments From Evil and Skeptical Theism. Philo 8 (2):84-94.
Richard Swinburne (2005). Second Reply to Grünbaum. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
Nathan A. Jacobs (2012). A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant's Religion. Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):210-228.
Keith E. Yandell (1972). Theism and Evil: A Reply. Sophia 11 (1):1-7.
Graham Oppy (2011). Perfection, Near-Perfection, Maximality, and Anselmian Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):119-138.
Douglas Hedley (1996). Pantheism, Trinitarian Theism and the Idea of Unity: Reflections on the Christian Concept of God. Religious Studies 32 (1):61 - 77.
Hud Hudson (2008). Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):452–470.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-06-02
Total downloads1 ( #445,994 of 1,102,868 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,281 of 1,102,868 )
How can I increase my downloads?