In Defence of Anthropomorphic Theism

Abstract
I reply to seven objections to anthropomorphic theism: (1) That anthropomorphic theism is idolatrous. In reply I rely on the concept/conception distinction. (2) That faith requires certainty. In reply I argue that full belief may be based on probable inference. (3) That the truly infinite is incomprehensible. In reply I distinguish two senses of knowing what you mean. (4) "You Kant say that!" In reply I distinguish shallow from deep Kantianism. (5) "Shall Old Aquinas be forgot?" In reply I discuss the simplicity of God. (6) What those garrulous mystics say about the ineffable. In reply I argue that mystics should be anthropomorphites. (7) Antitheodicy. In reply I distinguish the community of all agents from the community of finite frail agents
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,337
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Jeff Snapper (2011). Paying the Cost of Skeptical Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):45-56.
Peter Forrest (1996). Physicalism and Classical Theism. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):179-200.
Clement Dore (1986). A Reply to Professor Rowe. Faith and Philosophy 3 (3):314-318.
Piotr Sikora (2010). Ateism, Agnosticism, and Apothatic Theism. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):65-80.
Richard Swinburne (2005). Second Reply to Grünbaum. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):919-925.
Graham Oppy (2011). Perfection, Near-Perfection, Maximality, and Anselmian Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):119-138.
Hud Hudson (2008). Reply to Parsons, Reply to Heller, and Reply to Rea. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):452–470.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

Added to index

2012-06-02

Total downloads

1 ( #419,502 of 1,096,609 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #265,701 of 1,096,609 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.