Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):717-735 (2007)
|Abstract||There has been much recent debate concerning how Hannah Arendt's concepts of radical evil and the banality of evil `fit together', if at all. I argue that the first of these concepts deals with a certain type of evil, in particular the evil that occurred in the Nazi death camps. The second deals with a certain type of perpetrator of evil, in particular the banal `nobody', Eichmann. As such, bar a localized incompatibility in regard to Arendt's early account of the motivation of perpetrators of radical evil, these two concepts are independent but nonetheless highly complementary. Key Words: Hannah Arendt • banality of evil • Adolf Eichmann • evil • forgiveness • Immanuel Kant • punishment • radical evil.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Gelven (1998). This Side of Evil. Marquette University Press.
Hannah Arendt (2003). Responsibility and Judgment. Schocken Books.
Agnes Heller (2011). On Evils, Evil, Radical Evil and the Demonic. Critical Horizons 12 (1):15-27.
Pablo F. Muchnik (2006). On the Alleged Vacuity of Kant's Concept of Evil. Kant-Studien 97 (4):430-451.
Adam Morton (2004). On Evil. Routledge.
James Phillips (2004). From Radical to Banal Evil: Hannah Arendt Against the Justification of the Unjustifiable. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (2):129 – 158.
Jennifer L. Geddes (2003). Banal Evil and Useless Knowledge: Hannah Arendt and Charlotte Delbo on Evil After the Holocaust. Hypatia 18 (1):104-115.
Lars Fr H. Svendsen (2010). A Philosophy of Evil. Dalkey Archive Press.
Peg Birmingham (2003). Holes of Oblivion: The Banality of Radical Evil. Hypatia 18 (1):80-103.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #24,495 of 738,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?