David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 58 (1-3):65 - 77 (2005)
Rotter’s theory of internal-external locus of control evolved from Carl Jung’s work. In Psychological Types (1923), Jung defined two opposing tendencies in personality introversion and extroversion. While both tendencies are present in all individuals, one tends to dominate the other. The internal–external control construct was conceived as a generalized expectancy to perceive reinforcement either as contingent upon one’s own behaviors (internal control) or as the result of forces beyond one’s control, such as chance, fate, or powerful others (external control) (Lefcourt, 1981, p. 15). Locus of control refers to those causes to which individuals attribute their successes and failures. Individuals are responsive to some external motivators (e.g. better jobs, promotions, higher salaries), but the more powerful are internal pressures (the desire for increased job satisfaction, self-esteem, and quality of life). Research indicates that an individual’s internal–external locus of control impacts their ethical behavior in an organization. Rotter’s I–E Scale (1966, Psychological Monographics 80(1), 1–28), a 29 item forced choice instrument, is the most widely used instrument to measure the degree of internality versus externality. Each respondent’s score for this scale had a potential range from 0 to 23. As there are six filler items used to mask the intent of the questionnaire a score of 23 being extremely external in nature and a score of zero being extremely internal in nature. The I Scale (Internal Scale) measures the extent to which people believe that they have control over their own lives; the E Scale (External Scale) measures the extent to which people believe that they do not have control over their own lives. This study utilized the I–E Scale. Jones (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) and Deflumeri (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation) investigated the likelihood of an individual to engage in unethical behavior in an organization. This research suggests that when employees perceive that locus of control resides internally they themselves decide what is appropriate behavior, but with an external locus of control, employees will look at others to decide appropriate behavior. The researcher in this study investigated the relationship between managers’ locus of control and their moral reasoning.
|Keywords||Moral reasoning locus of control|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicole Andreoli & Joel Lefkowitz (2009). Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Misconduct in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 85 (3):309 - 332.
Natalia M. Mintchik & Timothy A. Farmer (2009). Associations Between Epistemological Beliefs and Moral Reasoning: Evidence From Accounting. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (2):259 - 275.
Adenekan Dedeke (2013). A Cognitive–Intuitionist Model of Moral Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics:1-21.
Carmel Herington & Scott Weaven (2008). Improving Consistency for Dit Results Using Cluster Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 80 (3):499 - 514.
Natalia M. Mintchik & Timothy A. Farmer (2009). Associations Between Epistemological Beliefs and Moral Reasoning: Evidence From Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (2):259-275.
Similar books and articles
Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Daniel M. Wolpert & Christopher D. Frith (2002). Abnormalities in the Awareness of Action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (6):237-242.
John Cherry (2006). The Impact of Normative Influence and Locus of Control on Ethical Judgments and Intentions: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):113 - 132.
G. Knoblich & T. T. J. Kircher (2004). Deceiving Oneself About Being in Control: Conscious Detection of Changes in Visuomotor Coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 30 (4):657-66.
Chieh-Peng Lin & Cherng G. Ding (2003). Modeling Information Ethics: The Joint Moderating Role of Locus of Control and Job Insecurity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 48 (4):335-346.
Randy K. Chiu (2003). Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing Intention: Examining the Moderating Role of Locus of Control. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (1-2):65 - 74.
John A. Bargh (2005). Bypassing the Will: Toward Demystifying the Nonconscious Control of Social Behavior. In Ran R. Hassin, James S. Uleman & John A. Bargh (eds.), The New Unconscious. Oxford Series in Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. Oxford University Press. 37-58.
Walter Tubbs (1994). The Roots of Stress-Death and Juvenile Delinquency in Japan: Disciplinary Ambivalence and Perceived Locus of Control. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):507 - 522.
Almerinda Forte (2004). Business Ethics: A Study of the Moral Reasoning of Selected Business Managers and the Influence of Organizational Ethical Climate. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):167-173.
Almerinda Forte (2004). Antecedents of Managers Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (4):313-347.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #81,530 of 1,140,006 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #157,514 of 1,140,006 )
How can I increase my downloads?