Physicalism, instrumentalism and the semantics of modal logic
Journal of Philosophical Logic 12 (3):271 - 298 (1983)
| Abstract | The delicate point in the formalistic position is to explain how the non-intuitionistic classical mathematics is significant, after having initially agreed with the intuitionists that its theorems lack a real meaning in terms of which they are true (S. C. Kleene, 1952). | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesAnna Bucalo (1994). Modalities in Linear Logic Weaker Than the Exponential “of Course”: Algebraic and Relational Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (3):211-232.
Sergei N. Artemov (2001). Explicit Provability and Constructive Semantics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-36.
Tapio Korte, Ari Maunu & Tuomo Aho (2009). Modal Logic From Kant to Possible Worlds Semantics. In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press.
Peter Fritz (2013). A Logic for Epistemic Two-Dimensional Semantics. Synthese 190 (10):1753-1770.
Colin Oakes (1999). Interpretations of Intuitionist Logic in Non-Normal Modal Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (1):47-60.
Norihiro Kamide (2002). Kripke Semantics for Modal Substructural Logics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,803 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,803 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
