Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The concepts of Euclidean distance, or a geodesic, are of course suitable models for the practical application of measurement at classical scale. However, it will be argued here that the complete picture of the abstract geometry that intervenes two points necessarily involves a dynamical network of discrete intervals. Then measurement concepts that aim to remain valid at microscopic length scales must take account of dynamical update in that network. The abstract model developed on that basis displays characteristics analogous to quantum mechanical features; then it is proposed for consideration as the ‘very general model’ of interest to quantum gravity programs. This model suggests that the current formulation of classical mathematics is antithetical to the unification program of quantum gravity.|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Julian B. Barbour (1994). The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity: II. The Appearance of Dynamics in Static Configurations. Classical and Quantum Gravity 11:2875--97.
Henrik Zinkernagel (2006). The Philosophy Behind Quantum Gravity. Theoria 21 (3):295-312.
James Mattingly (2009). Mongrel Gravity. Erkenntnis 70 (3):379 - 395.
Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) (1986). Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Gordon Belot & John Earman (2001). Pre-Socratic Quantum Gravity. In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press.
Chuang Liu (1993). The Arrow of Time in Quantum Gravity. Philosophy of Science 60 (4):619-637.
Added to index2009-12-16
Total downloads150 ( #3,407 of 740,983 )
Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #7,151 of 740,983 )
How can I increase my downloads?