David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The concepts of Euclidean distance, or a geodesic, are of course suitable models for the practical application of measurement at classical scale. However, it will be argued here that the complete picture of the abstract geometry that intervenes two points necessarily involves a dynamical network of discrete intervals. Then measurement concepts that aim to remain valid at microscopic length scales must take account of dynamical update in that network. The abstract model developed on that basis displays characteristics analogous to quantum mechanical features; then it is proposed for consideration as the ‘very general model’ of interest to quantum gravity programs. This model suggests that the current formulation of classical mathematics is antithetical to the unification program of quantum gravity.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Julian B. Barbour (1994). The Timelessness of Quantum Gravity: II. The Appearance of Dynamics in Static Configurations. Classical and Quantum Gravity 11:2875--97.
Chuang Liu (1993). The Arrow of Time in Quantum Gravity. Philosophy of Science 60 (4):619-637.
Gordon Belot & John Earman (2001). Pre-Socratic Quantum Gravity. In Craig Callender & Nick Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale. Cambridge University Press. 213--55.
Roger Penrose & C. J. Isham (eds.) (1986). Quantum Concepts in Space and Time. New York ;Oxford University Press.
James Mattingly (2009). Mongrel Gravity. Erkenntnis 70 (3):379 - 395.
Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham (1999). On the Emergence of Time in Quantum Gravity. In , The Arguments of Time. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press. 111--168.
Henrik Zinkernagel (2006). The Philosophy Behind Quantum Gravity. Theoria 21 (3):295-312.
Added to index2009-12-16
Total downloads163 ( #4,328 of 1,101,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #17,316 of 1,101,781 )
How can I increase my downloads?