David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):97-110 (2008)
The phrase ‘The iterative conception of sets’ conjures up a picture of a particular settheoretic universe – the cumulative hierarchy – and the constant conjunction of phrasewith-picture is so reliable that people tend to think that the cumulative hierarchy is all there is to the iterative conception of sets: if you conceive sets iteratively, then the result is the cumulative hierarchy. In this paper, I shall be arguing that this is a mistake: the iterative conception of set is a good one, for all the usual reasons. However, the cumulative hierarchy is merely one way among many of working out this conception, and arguments in favour of an iterative conception have been mistaken for arguments in favour of this one special instance of it. (This may be the point to get out of the way the observation that although philosophers of mathematics write of the iterative conception of set, what they really mean – in the terminology of modern computer science at least – is the recursive conception of sets. Nevertheless, having got that quibble off my chest, I shall continue to write of the iterative conception like everyone else.).
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Justin Clarke-Doane (2013). What is Absolute Undecidability?†. Noûs 47 (3):467-481.
Leon Horsten & Øystein Linnebo (2016). Term Models for Abstraction Principles. Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (1):1-23.
Toby Meadows (2016). Sets and Supersets. Synthese 193 (6):1875-1907.
Otávio Bueno (2013). Perception and Conception: Shaping Human Minds. [REVIEW] Biosemiotics 6 (3):323-336.
Similar books and articles
Mark F. Sharlow (2001). Broadening the Iterative Conception of Set. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42 (3):149-170.
Alexander Paseau (2007). Boolos on the Justification of Set Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):30-53.
M. D. Potter (1993). Iterative Set Theory. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (171):178-193.
Stephen Pollard (1985). Plural Quantification and the Iterative Concept of Set. Philosophy Research Archives 11:579-587.
Mark F. Sharlow (1987). Proper Classes Via the Iterative Conception of Set. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):636-650.
Luca Incurvati (2012). How to Be a Minimalist About Sets. Philosophical Studies 159 (1):69-87.
Eric Steinhart (2002). Logically Possible Machines. Minds and Machines 12 (2):259-280.
George Boolos (1971). The Iterative Conception of Set. Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):215-231.
Adam Rieger (2011). Paradox, ZF and the Axiom of Foundation. In D. DeVidi, M. Hallet & P. Clark (eds.), Logic, Mathematics, Philosophy, Vintage Enthusiasms: Essays in Honour of John L. Bell. Springer
Christopher Menzel (1986). On the Iterative Explanation of the Paradoxes. Philosophical Studies 49 (1):37 - 61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads145 ( #26,626 of 1,911,519 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #253,681 of 1,911,519 )
How can I increase my downloads?