Human Studies 30 (2):57 - 77 (2007)
|Abstract||Evil acts strike us, by their very nature, as not only horrifying and reprehensible, but also as deeply puzzling. No doubt for reasons like this, evil has often been seen as mysterious, demonic and beyond our human powers of understanding. The question I examine in this paper is whether or not we can (or would want to) overcome this puzzlement in the face of evil acts. I shall argue that we ought want to (in all cases) and can (in at least most cases) come to understand why people perpetrate evil acts. This is an appealing conclusion as it allows us to take practical steps to both minimise future occurrences of evil and come to terms with its past abominations.|
|Keywords||Arendt Eichmann Empathy Evil Explanation Hitler Identification Simulation Theory Understanding|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Hamilton (1999). The Nature of Evil a Reply to Garrard. Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):122 – 138.
Adam Morton (2004). On Evil. Routledge.
Vinit Haksar (2011). Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
Paul Formosa (2009). Kant on the Limits of Human Evil. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:189-214.
Samuel P. Oliner (2011). The Nature of Good and Evil: Understanding the Many Acts of Moral and Immoral Behavior. Paragon House.
Michael Gelven (1998). This Side of Evil. Marquette University Press.
Eve Garrard (1998). The Nature of Evil. Philosophical Explorations 1 (1):43 – 60.
Todd Calder (2003). The Apparent Banality of Evil: The Relationship Between Evil Acts and Evil Character. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):364–376.
Lars Fr H. Svendsen (2010). A Philosophy of Evil. Dalkey Archive Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #53,586 of 722,859 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,859 )
How can I increase my downloads?