David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Stuart R. Hameroff, Alfred W. Kaszniak & A. C. Scott (eds.), Journal of Consciousness Studies. MIT Press 185-201 (1998)
One of the most exciting aspects of this journal, of which I am proud to be an executive editor, is that it has become a venue in which so many distinct fields can interact on a single question, that of consciousness. I know of no other question, or journal, which has brought together so many voices, from so many fields, to swirl around a single topic. It is exciting both to provide a forum and to be a part of this debate. In this article I would like to bring the findings of my somewhat unusual but increasingly accepted field -- mysticism-- to the discussion, for I think they may offer some helpful insights about consciousness. Why? When a biologist seeks to understand a complex phenomenon, one key strategy is to look to at it in its simplest form. Probably the most famous is the humble bacterium E. coli. Its simple gene structure has allowed us to understand much of the gene functioning of complex species. Similarly many biologists have turned to the `memory' of the simple sea slug to understand our own more kaleidoscopic memory. Freud and Durkheim both used totemism, which they construed as the simplest form of religion, to understand the complexities of religious life. The methodological principle is: to understand something complex turn to its simple forms
|Keywords||Biology Consciousness Memory Metaphysics Mysticism Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jacob Berger (2014). Consciousness is Not a Property of States: A Reply to Wilberg. Philosophical Psychology 27 (6):829-842.
Christopher T. Burris & Eugene Lai (2012). Through with the Looking Glass: Escape Responses to Implicit Mirror Exposure. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):464-470.
Similar books and articles
Knight Dunlap (1920/1971). Mysticism, Freudianism, and Scientific Psychology. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
Paul Tillich (1974). Mysticism and Guilt-Consciousness in Schelling's Philosophical Development. Lewisburg [Pa.]Bucknell University Press.
Grace M. Jantzen (1994). Feminists, Philosophers, and Mystics. Hypatia 9 (4):186 - 206.
Rudolf Otto (1960/1987). Mysticism East and West: A Comparative Analysis of the Nature of Mysticism. Thesophical Pub. House.
Jean Houston (1965). Psycho-Chemistry and the Religious Consciousness. International Philosophical Quarterly 5 (September):397-413.
Robert K. C. Korman (1986). Pure Consciousness Events and Mysticism. Sophia 25 (April):49-58.
Robert K. C. Forman (ed.) (1998). The Innate Capacity: Mysticism, Psychology, and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Rocco J. Gennaro (1992). Consciousness, Self-Consciousness, and Episodic Memory. Philosophical Psychology 5 (4):333-47.
Leonard Angel (2004). Universal Self Consciousness Mysticism and the Physical Completeness Principle. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (1):1-29.
R. Forman (ed.) (1990). The Problem of Pure Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #179,414 of 1,699,546 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #69,042 of 1,699,546 )
How can I increase my downloads?