Sophia 49 (1) (2010)
|Abstract||In his recent paper in Sophia , ‘Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?’ Nick Trakakis endorses the position that theodicy, whether intellectually successful or not, is a morally obnoxious enterprise. My aim in this paper is to defend theodicy from this accusation. I concede that God the Creator is a moral monster by human standards and neither to be likened to a loving parent nor imitated. Nonetheless, God is morally perfect. What is abhorrent is not tough-minded theodicy but the hubris of imitating God. I further claim that it is no accident that the same sort of objection is made to act utilitarianism as to tough-minded theodicy if the latter is misinterpreted as implying a guide for human action.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Brett Gaul (2004). Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
Richard Gale (1998). R. M. Adams's Theodicy of Grace. Philo 1 (1):36-44.
Richard Swinburne (1983). ``A Theodicy of Heaven and Hell&Quot. In Alfred J. Freddoso (ed.), The Existence and Nature of God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Richard Swinburne (1983). A Theodicy of Heaven and Hell. In A. J. Freddoso (ed.), The Existence and Nature of God. Univ Notre Dame Pr.
Richard M. Gale (2000). Swinburne on Providence. Religious Studies 36 (2):209-219.
Richard Swinburne (1988). Does Theism Need a Theodicy? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
Richard Swinburne (1995). Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God's Rights. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38 (1-3):75 - 91.
Charles Seymour (2000). A Craigian Theodicy of Hell. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):103-115.
Added to index2009-12-26
Total downloads82 ( #9,268 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?