David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sophia 49 (1):37-47 (2010)
In his recent paper in Sophia , ‘Theodicy: The Solution to the Problem of Evil, or Part of the Problem?’ Nick Trakakis endorses the position that theodicy, whether intellectually successful or not, is a morally obnoxious enterprise. My aim in this paper is to defend theodicy from this accusation. I concede that God the Creator is a moral monster by human standards and neither to be likened to a loving parent nor imitated. Nonetheless, God is morally perfect. What is abhorrent is not tough-minded theodicy but the hubris of imitating God. I further claim that it is no accident that the same sort of objection is made to act utilitarianism as to tough-minded theodicy if the latter is misinterpreted as implying a guide for human action.
|Keywords||Theodicy Anti-theodicy Utilitarianism Incommensurability Moral community Hubris Best explanation apologetics Horrendous evils|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Timothy O'Connor (2008). Theism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency. Blackwell Pub..
Alvin Plantinga (1992). The Nature of Necessity. Clarendon Press.
John Jamieson Carswell Smart & Bernard Williams (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Swinburne (1996). Is There a God? Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Samuel Shearn (2013). Moral Critique and Defence of Theodicy. Religious Studies 49 (4):439-458.
Similar books and articles
Brett Gaul (2004). Is the Problem of Evil a Problem for Descartes? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:209-220.
Charles Seymour (2000). A Craigian Theodicy of Hell. Faith and Philosophy 17 (1):103-115.
Richard Swinburne (1995). Theodicy, Our Well-Being, and God's Rights. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38 (1-3):75 - 91.
Richard Swinburne (1988). Does Theism Need a Theodicy? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):287 - 311.
Richard M. Gale (2000). Swinburne on Providence. Religious Studies 36 (2):209-219.
Richard Swinburne (1983). A Theodicy of Heaven and Hell. In A. J. Freddoso (ed.), The Existence and Nature of God. Univ Notre Dame Pr. 37-54.
Richard Gale (1998). R. M. Adams's Theodicy of Grace. Philo 1 (1):36-44.
N. N. Trakakis (2010). Against Theodicy: A Response to Peter Forrest. Sophia 49 (1):129-140.
Added to index2009-12-26
Total downloads92 ( #20,110 of 1,696,807 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #96,298 of 1,696,807 )
How can I increase my downloads?