Ways worlds could be
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (1):15 – 24 (1986)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGreg Restall (1997). Ways Things Can't Be. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):583-596.
Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Pedersen (2006). Ways of Worlds I-II. Studia Logica 84 (2).
Jonathan Harrison (1999). The Impossibility of ‘Possible’ Worlds. Philosophy 74 (1):5-28.
Jeffrey C. King (2007). What in the World Are the Ways Things Might Have Been? [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 133 (3):443 - 453.
James Harold (2010). The Value of Fictional Worlds (or Why 'the Lord of the Rings' is Worth Reading). Contemporary Aesthetics 8.
Vincent F. Hendricks & Stig Andur Pedersen (2006). Ways of Worlds I–II Two Special Issues on Possible Worlds and Related Notions. Studia Logica 82 (3).
Edward N. Zalta (1997). A Classically-Based Theory of Impossible Worlds. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (4):640-660.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads82 ( #9,240 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,273 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
