David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (1):44-47 (2014)
This paper contends that the conventional ethical and legal ways of analysing the wrong involved in the misuse of human body parts are inadequate, and should be replaced with an analysis based on human dignity. It examines the various ways in which dignity has been understood, outlines many of the criticisms made of those ways , and proposes a new way of seeing dignity which is exegetically consonant with the way in which dignity has been historically understood, and yet avoids the pitfalls which have led to dignity being dismissed by many as hopelessly amorphous or incurably theological. The account of dignity proposed is broadly Aristotelian. It defines dignity in terms of human thriving, and presupposes that it is possible, at least in principle, to determine empirically what makes humans thrive. It contends that humans are quintessentially relational animals, and that it is not possible to define humans as atomistic entities. One important corollary of this is that when using dignity/thriving as a criterion for determining the ethical acceptability of a proposed action or inaction, one should ask not merely how the dignity interests of the patient would be affected, but how the dignity interests of all stakeholders would be affected. The business of ethics is then the business of auditing all those interests, and determining the course of action which would maximise the amount of thriving in the world
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lennart Nordenfelt (2004). The Varieties of Dignity. Health Care Analysis 12 (2):69-81.
Lawrence Burns (2007). Gunther Von Hagens' Body Worlds: Selling Beautiful Education. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):12 – 23.
Stephen Dilley & Nathan J. Palpant (eds.) (2012). Human Dignity in Bioethics: From Worldviews to the Public Square. Routledge.
Fabrice Jotterand (2010). Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):45-52.
Thomas De Koninck (2009). Protecting Human Dignity in Research Involving Humans. Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):17-25.
Marleen Rozemond (2014). The Faces of Simplicity in Descartes’s Soul. In Dominik Perler & Klaus Corcilius (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates From Plato to Leibniz. De Gruyter. 219-244.
Alasdair Cochrane (2010). Undignified Bioethics. Bioethics 24 (5):234-241.
Carol V. A. Quinn (2008). Towards a Social Conception of Dignity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):89-101.
Hillel Steiner (2004). The Right to Trade in Human Body Parts. In Jonathan Seglow (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. F. Cass Publishers. 187-193.
Shaoping Gan (2009). Human Dignity as a Right. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (3):370-384.
Nick Bostrom (2008). Dignity and Enhancement. In Adam Schulman (ed.), Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. [President's Council on Bioethics.
Deryck Beyleveld & Roger Brownsword (2000). My Body, My Body Parts, My Property? Health Care Analysis 8 (2):87-99.
Diego S. Silva (2010). Dignity Promotion and Beneficence. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (4):365-372.
M. J. Cherry (2000). The Body for Charity, Profit and Holiness: Commerce in Human Body Parts. Christian Bioethics 6 (2):127-138.
Added to index2012-08-15
Total downloads2 ( #501,593 of 1,696,589 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,974 of 1,696,589 )
How can I increase my downloads?