David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:28 - 39 (1984)
Peirce measures the testability of scientific hypotheses by these oft-repeated standards: "money, time, energy, thought". His concept of testability is outlined and developed. It is found to be strikingly different, but not incompatible with, the positivist-empiricist concept of testability- in-principle. Peirce's concept of testability is, however, much richer than the received positivist-empiricist concept, and plays a larger, more central role in the logic of science, as Peirce sees it. In particular, Peirce's concept, in its role in his theory of the economy of research, shows how the acceptance of scientific hypotheses is itself a function of economic factors, and thus is not value-neutral.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Nicholas Rescher (1976). Peirce and the Economy of Research. Philosophy of Science 43 (1):71-98.
James R. Wible (1994). Charles Sanders Peirce's Economy of Research. Journal of Economic Methodology 1 (1):135-160.
Douglas Greenlee (1976). Peirce's Concept of Sign: Further Reflections. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (2):135 - 147.
Robert J. Roth (1988). Anderson on Peirce's Concept of Abduction: Further Reflections. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 24 (1):131 - 139.
Jaime Nubiola (2005). Abduction or the Logic of Surprise. Semiotica 153 (1/4):117-130.
Kenneth G. Lucey (1975). The Testability of the Identity Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (August):142-147.
Jérôme Havenel (2008). Peirce's Clarifications of Continuity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (1):pp. 86-133.
David K. Henderson (1991). On the Testability of Psychological Generalizations (Psychological Testability). Philosophy of Science (December) 586 (December):586-606.
Abraham Rudnick (2003). Paranoia and Reinforced Dogmatism: Beyond Critical Rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):339-350.
Michael Hoffmann (1999). Problems with Peirce's Concept of Abduction. Foundations of Science 4 (3):271-305.
Jaime J. Marcio (2001). Thought Is Essentially An Action. Inquiry 21 (1):33-42.
Stefan Kappner (2000). Why Should We Adopt the Scientific Method? A Response to Misak's Interpretation of Peirce's Concept of Belief. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36 (2):255 - 270.
W. M. Brown (1983). The Economy of Peirce's Abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 19 (4):397 - 411.
Daniel G. Campos (2007). Peirce on the Role of Poietic Creation in Mathematical Reasoning. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (3):470 - 489.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-05-29
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?