States and Moral Pluralism

Hastings Center Report 37 (6):24 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Bioethicists are often interested mostly in national standards and institutions, but state governments have historically overseen a wide range of bioethical issues and share responsibility with the federal government for still others. States ought to have an important role. By allowing for multiple outcomes, the American federal system allows a better fit between public opinion and public policies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Value Pluralism and Liberal Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (1):87-100.
Minimal, moderate, and extreme moral pluralism.Peter S. Wenz - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (1):61-74.
A Humean Account of Moral Pluralism.Michael B. Gill - 2012 - Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica 25 (3):571-588.
Should we create a health care system in the united states?Laurence B. McCullough - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):483-490.
The Case against Moral Pluralism.J. Baird Callicott - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (2):99-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
47 (#331,642)

6 months
13 (#184,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Federalism for Bioethics?Leslie Francis & John Francis - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (1):112-120.
Federalism, federalism everywhere.Summer Johnson - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):1 – 2.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references