Psychology as public philosophy: An illustration of the moral dimension of psychology with marital research
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):124-136 (1993)
Suggests that contemporary marriage is at the heart of a serious cultural paradox that renders it strongly valued, but rather brittle. Scientific and therapeutic approaches to this dilemma have had limited success in resolving this problem because professionals have accepted and promoted the popular aspiration of personal fulfillment through marriage, which may have engendered the fragility of marriage. The author provides a brief hermeneutic account designed to make the incoherence of contemporary marriage more intelligible, and to clarify the moral dimension of psychology. Marital research illustrates how a hermeneutic perspective can guide a specific research domain in becoming more responsive to the essential social and ethical concerns that animate it. Suggestions for how researchers can explore why marriage is so central to modern life are offered. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
|Keywords||social centrality & brittle nature of contemporary marriage, moral dimension of psychology & role of hermeneutics in marital research, conference presentation|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Pakaluk & Giles Pearson (eds.) (2011). Moral Psychology and Human Action in Aristotle. Oxford University Press.
N. J. H. Dent (1984). The Moral Psychology of the Virtues. Cambridge University Press.
John D. Greenwood (2011). On the Social Dimensions of Moral Psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4):333-364.
John Michael Doris (2010). The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Nadelhoffer, Eddy A. Nahmias & Shaun Nichols (eds.) (2010). Moral Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Blaine J. Fowers (2012). Placing Virtue and the Human Good in Psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 32 (1):1-9.
James A. Waters & Frederick Bird (1987). The Moral Dimension of Organizational Culture. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (1):15 - 22.
David Morrow (2009). Moral Psychology and the Mencian Creature. Philosophical Psychology 22 (3):281-304.
John Doris (ed.) (2010). Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.
James A. Ryan (1998). Moral Philosophy and Moral Psychology in Mencius. Asian Philosophy 8 (1):47 – 64.
Paul Lewis (2010). The Emerging Comprehensive Moral Psychology of Darcia Narvaez. Tradition and Discovery 37 (3):9-18.
Kevin A. Aho (2012). Assessing the Role of Virtue Ethics in Psychology: A Commentary on the Work of Blaine Fowers, Frank Richardson, and Brent Slife. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 32 (1):43-49.
Joshua Knobe, Wesley Buckwalter, Philip Robbins, Hagop Sarkissian, Tamler Sommers & Shaun Nichols (2012). Experimental Philosophy. Annual Review of Psychology 63 (50):72-73.
Daniel K. Lapsley (1996). Moral Psychology. Westview Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads1 ( #505,938 of 1,679,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #183,003 of 1,679,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?