David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy East and West 58 (1):36-59 (2008)
: Puritanism and Confucianism have little in common in terms of their substantive teachings, but they do share an emphasis on bounded, authoritative, localized human arrangements, and this profoundly challenges the dominant presumptions of contemporary globalization. It is not enough to say that these worldviews are ‘‘communitarian’’ alternatives to globalism, for that defines away what needs to be explained. This article compares the ontology of certain elements of the Puritan and Confucian worldviews, and, by focusing on the role of both authority and activity in these systems, assesses (with the assistance of Max Weber) the theories of harmony that each invoke. It concludes by identifying the distinct options that these two modes of human existence suggest for those who wish to defend the relevance of boundedness and authority, and thus the very possibility of a human-scaled politics, in today’s world
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sungmoon Kim (2010). On Korean Dual Civil Society: Thinking Through Tocqueville and Confucius. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (4):434.
Raymond Geuss (2010). On Korean Dual Civil Society: Thinking Through Tocqueville and Confucius. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (4):434-457.
Sungmoon Kim (2010). On Korean Dual Civil Society: Thinking Through Tocqueville and Confucius. Contemporary Political Theory 9 (4):434-457.
Similar books and articles
Chenyang Li (2006). The Confucian Ideal of Harmony. Philosophy East and West 56 (4):583-603.
Scott Hershovitz (2011). The Role of Authority. Philosophers' Imprint 11 (7).
Louis Henkin (1998). Religion, Religions, and Human Rights. Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):229-239.
Xinzhong Yao & Weiming Tu (eds.) (2010). Confucian Studies: Critical Concepts in Asian Philosophy. Routledge.
Maurizio Scarpari (2003). The Debate on Human Nature in Early Confucian Literature. Philosophy East and West 53 (3):323-339.
Thorian Rane Harris, Arisotelian and Confucian Cultures of Authority : Justifying Moral Norms by Appeal to the Authority of Exemplary Persons.
Waheed Hussain (2009). No More Lemmings, Please - Reflections on the Communal Authority Thesis. Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):717 - 728.
Jason Aleksander (2011). Dante's Understanding of the Two Ends of Human Desire and the Relationship Between Philosophy and Theology. Journal of Religion 91 (2):158-187.
Jason Aleksander (2010). The Aporetic Ground of Revelation’s Authority in the Divine Comedy and Dante’s Demarcation and Defense of Philosophical Authority. Essays in Medieval Studies 26:1-14.
Huaiyu Wang (2011). What is the Matter with Conscience?: A Confucian Critique of Modern Imperialism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (2):209-229.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #248,087 of 1,911,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #252,427 of 1,911,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?