Implicature calculation, pragmatics or syntax, or both?
| Abstract | The neo-Gricean account: the source of these scalar implicatures is a reasoning process (undertaken by the hearer), which culminates in an inference about the belief state of the speaker. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesChristopher Gauker (2001). Situated Inference Versus Conversational Implicature. Noûs 35 (2):163–189.
Leon Horsten (2005). On the Quantitative Scalar or-Implicature. Synthese 146 (1-2):111 - 127.
Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) (2007). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kepa Korta & John Perry (2008). The Pragmatic Circle. Synthese 165 (3):347 - 357.
Bart Geurts (2010). Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Swanson (2010). Structurally Defined Alternatives and Lexicalizations of XOR. Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (1):31-36.
Bart Geurts (2009). Scalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics. Mind and Language 24 (1):51-79.
Patrick Hawley (2002). What is Said. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8):969-991.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads22 ( #56,076 of 548,977 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,977 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
