"It's crucial they're treated as patients": ethical guidance and empirical evidence regarding treating doctor-patients
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):7-11 (2009)
Ethical guidance from the British Medical Association (BMA) about treating doctor–patients is compared and contrasted with evidence from a qualitative study of general practitioners (GPs) who have been patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 17 GPs who had experienced a significant illness. Their experiences were discussed and issues about both being and treating doctor–patients were revealed. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to evaluate the data. In this article data extracts are used to illustrate and discuss three key points that summarise the BMA ethical guidance, in order to develop a picture of how far experiences map onto guidance. The data illustrate and extend the complexities of the issues outlined by the BMA document. In particular, differences between experienced GPs and those who have recently completed their training are identified. This analysis will be useful for medical professionals both when they themselves are unwell and when they treat doctor–patients. It will also inform recommendations for professionals who educate medical students or trainees
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gary Malinas & John Bigelow (2001). Simpson's Paradox: A Logically Benign, Empirically Treacherous Hydra. The Monist 84 (2):265 - 283.
Jerome Lowenstein (2005). The Midnight Meal and Other Essays About Doctors, Patients, and Medicine. University of Michigan Press.
Eugene J. Stein (1980). Doctors and Patients: Partners or Adversaries? [REVIEW] Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):118-122.
Helge Skirbekk & Per Nortvedt (2012). Inadequate Treatment for Elderly Patients: Professional Norms and Tight Budgets Could Cause “Ageism” in Hospitals. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (2):1-10.
Haidan Chen & Herbert Gottweis (2013). Stem Cell Treatments in China: Rethinking the Patient Role in the Global Bio‐Economy. Bioethics 27 (4):194-207.
Michael Cholbi (2006). Belief Attribution and the Falsification of Motive Internalism. Philosophical Psychology 19 (5):607 – 616.
Anika A. Jordbru, Ejgil Jespersen & Egil Martinsen (2008). Conversion Gait Disordermeeting Patients in Behaviour, Reuniting Body and Mind. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2):185 – 199.
Ejgil Jespersen, Anika A. Jordbru & Egil Martinsen (2008). Conversion Gait Disorder—Meeting Patients in Behaviour, Reuniting Body and Mind. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2):185-199.
A. Kessel & Michael J. Crawford (1997). Openness with Patients: A Categorical Imperative to Correct an Imbalance. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):297-304.
Nancy S. Jecker (1990). Anencephalic Infants and Special Relationships. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Amy M. Bovi (2003). Ethical Guidelines for Use of Electronic Mail Between Patients and Physicians. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):43-47.
Erica Haimes & Ken Taylor (2011). The Contributions of Empirical Evidence to Socio-Ethical Debates on Fresh Embryo Donation for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Bioethics 25 (6):334-341.
Aaron D. Levine & Leslie E. Wolf (2012). The Roles and Responsibilities of Physicians in Patients' Decisions About Unproven Stem Cell Therapies. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (1):122-134.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads6 ( #237,968 of 1,692,449 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #184,284 of 1,692,449 )
How can I increase my downloads?