Graduate studies at Western
OUP Oxford (2011)
|Abstract||Political theory is traditionally concerned with the justification and limits of state power. It asks: Can states legitimately direct and coerce non-consenting subjects? If they can, what limits, if any, constrain sovereign power? Public law is concerned with the justification and limits of judicial power. It asks: On what grounds can judges 'read down' or 'read in' statutory language against the apparent intention of the legislature? What limits, if any, are appropriate to these exercises of judicial power? This book develops an original constitutional theory of political authority that yields novel answers to both sets of questions. Fox-Decent argues that the state is a fiduciary of its people, and that this fiduciary relationship grounds the state's authority to announce and enforce law. The fiduciary state is conceived of as a public agent of necessity charged with guaranteeing a regime of secure and equal freedom. Whereas the social contract tradition struggles to ground authority on consent, the fiduciary theory explains authority with reference to the state's fiduciary obligation to respect legal principles constitutive of the rule of law. This obligation arises from the state's possession of irresistible public powers. The author begins with a discussion of Hobbes's conception of legality and the problem of discretionary power in administrative law. Drawing on Kant, he sketches a theory of fiduciary relations, and develops the argument through three parts. Part I shows that it is possible for the state to stand in a public fiduciary relationship to its people through a discussion of Crown-Native fiduciary relations recognized by Canadian courts. Part II sets out the theoretical underpinnings of the fiduciary theory of the state. Part III explores the implications of the fiduciary theory for administrative law and common law constitutionalism. The final chapter situates the theory within a broader philosophical discussion of the rule of law.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$69.95 used (30% off) $79.25 new (20% off) $89.10 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew Lister (2012). Review of Sovereignty’s Promise: The State as Fiduciary by Evan Fox-Decent. [REVIEW] Ethics 123 (1):150-4.
Evan Fox-Decent (2008). Is the Rule of Law Really Indifferent to Human Rights? Law and Philosophy 27 (6):533 - 581.
Matthew Lister (2012). Book Reviews Fox-Decent , Evan . Sovereignty's Promise: The State as Fiduciary Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. 283. $99.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 123 (1):150-154.
Thomas Alured Faunce & T. A. Bolsin, Fiduciary Disclosure of Medical Mistakes: The Duty to Promptly Notify Patients of Adverse Health Care Events.
Malcolm Thorburn (2011). The Constitution of Criminal Law: Justifications, Policing and the Stateâ€™s Fiduciary Duties. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):259-276.
Alexei M. Marcoux (2003). A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Andrew Wicks (1999). Getting Real. Business Ethics Quarterly 9 (2):273-293.
Wayne Vaught (2003). Trust, Covert Surveillance and Fiduciary Obligations. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (1):87-92.
Sallyanne Payton (1992). The Concept of the Person in the Parens Patriae Jurisdiction Over Previously Competent Persons. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (6):605-645.
John R. Boatright (1994). Fiduciary Duties and the Shareholder-Management Relation. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4):393-407.
William Martin (2009). Socially Responsible Investing: Is Your Fiduciary Duty at Risk? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (4):549 - 560.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads1 ( #292,563 of 739,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?