Apocalypse and the breaking-open of dialogue: A negatively theological perspective
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (2):65-86 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStanley Hauerwas (1985). Time and History in Theological Ethics: The Work of James Gustafson. Journal of Religious Ethics 13 (1):3 - 21.
David M. Woodruff (forthcoming). Being and Doing in the Concept of God. Philosophia 35 (3-4):313-320.
Paul Franceschi (1998). Une Solution Pour l'Argument de l'Apocalypse. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):227 - 246.
H. Gregory Snyder (2003). The Apocalypse and Imperial Cult S. J. Friesen: Imperial Cults and the Apocalypse of John. Reading Revelation in the Ruins . Pp. XIII + 285, Ills. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Cased, £40. Isbn: 0-19-513153-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 53 (01):177-.
Chuang Liu (2003). Classical Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1219-1232.
Alan Rhoda (forthcoming). The Philosophical Case for Open Theism. Philosophia 35 (3-4):301-311.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,125 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
