History and Philosophy of Logic 21 (2):147-162 (2000)
|Abstract||I present a formal framework historically faithful to Leibniz's analysis of relational sentences, which: (i) engrafts thematic roles and the non-truth-functional connective insofar as (quatenus) into the monadic fragment of first-order logic; (ii) suggests a plausible ontological picture of thematic roles and relational facts; (iii) supports argument deletion and related inferential patterns that are not taken into account by standard first-order logic|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Harry G. Frankfurt (1972). Leibniz. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
Harry G. Frankfurt (1976). Leibniz: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press.
Scuola Normale Superiore (2010). Leibniz and 'Bradley's Regress'. The Leibniz Review 20:1-12.
Paul M. Pietroski (1998). Actions, Adjuncts, and Agency. Mind 107 (425):73-111.
Peter M. Arkadiev (2008). Thematic Roles, Event Structure, and Argument Encoding in Semantically Aligned Languages. In Mark Donohue & Søren Wichmann (eds.), The Typology of Semantic Alignment. Oxford University Press.
Francesco Orilia (2011). Relational Order and Onto-Thematic Roles. Metaphysica 12 (1):1-18.
Yael Ravin (1990). Lexical Semantics Without Thematic Roles. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads9 ( #122,367 of 722,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?