David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 42 (01):284- (1992)
E's ‘unam’ is the reading favoured by all modern editors. Either reading is possible in terms of sense and metre, and the choice is not an easy one. The attraction of ‘ unam’ is obvious and consists in the stress which it lays on Jocasta's isolation and vulnerability in the face of ‘omnis… iuuentus’. The appeal of ‘una’ is a little more subtle. It emphasises the coming together of the youth, whether Argive or Theban, in common cause against the aged Jocasta. It is ironical that the two fiercely opposed sides are urged to come together not against a mutual foe but against a defenceless old woman. And even more ironical is the notion of the brothers' uniting to kill their mother: from the beginning of the play they have been portrayed as uncompromisingly hostile to each other; now, bent on the impious act of fratricide, they are envisaged as acting together for the first time, but only to accomplish an equally great or even greater impiety – matricide. The reading of A is attractive not only because of the characteristic irony which it expresses, but also because it heralds the even stronger expression of the same notion in 445 with ‘ciuis atque hostis simul…’. One may note also that ‘omnis ruat / una’ appears to be an echo of Vergil's ‘una omnes mere’
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Susanna Morton Braund (1998). Seneca's Phoenissae M. Frank: Seneca's Phoenissae. Introduction and Commentary. (Mnemosyne Supplement, 138.) Pp. Xvii + 268. Leiden, New York, and Cologne: E. J. Brill, 1995. Cased. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 48 (1):33-34.
S. J. Harrison (2003). Hot or Strong? A Textual Note on Seneca, Phoenissae 254. Classical Quarterly 53 (2):633-634.
S. Morton Braund (1998). Seneca's Phoenissae. Introduction and Commentary. M Frank. The Classical Review 48 (1):33-34.
Roland Mayer (1991). Seneca's Phoenissae. The Classical Review 41 (01):63-.
James Diggle (1990). The Teubner Phoenissae D. J. Mastronarde: Euripides, Phoenissae. (Bibliotheca Teubneriana.) Pp. Xlix+154. Leipzig: Teubner, 1988. 59 M. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (01):6-11.
Roland Mayer (1991). Seneca's Phoenissae Theo Hirschberg: Senecas Phoenissen: Einleitung und Kommentar. (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, 31.) Pp. v + 169. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 1989. DM 92. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):63-64.
G. B. A. Fletcher (1929). Seneca's Suasoriae The Suasoriae of Seneca the Elder. Introductory Essay, Text, Translation and Explanatory Notes by William A. Edward, M.A., D.Litt. Pp. Xlvii + 160. Cambridge: University Press, 1928. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 43 (1):37-38.
A. E. Douglas (1985). Seneca's Troades Elaine Fantham: Seneca's Troades. A Literary Introduction with Text, Introduction and Commentary. Pp. Xii + 412. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. £31.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):33-34.
J. U. Powell (1910). Euripides, Phoenissae Euripides, Phoenissae. Edited by A. C. Pearson, M.A., Sometime Scholar of Christ's College, Cambridge, Formerly Assistant Master in Dulwich College. Cambridge: At the University Press. 1909. Price 4s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (04):126-127.
Roland Mayer (1990). Seneca's Hercules John G. Fitch (Ed.): Seneca's Hercules Furens. A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary. (Cornell Studies in Classical Philology, 45.) Pp. 489. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1987. $49.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):272-274.
E. M. Craik (1995). Euripides' Phoenissae Donald J. Mastronarde: Euripides, Phoenissae: Edited with Introduction and Commentary. (Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries, 29.) Pp. Viii+673. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Cased, £55/$90. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (01):8-10.
W. S. Maguinness (1959). Moses Hadas: (1) Seneca's Medea; (2) Seneca's Oedipus; (3) Seneca's Thyestes. Translated with Introductions. Pp. 39, 38, 32. New York, The Liberal Arts Press, 1955, 1956, 1957. Paper, 45 C. Each. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (02):174-175.
Roland Mayer (1989). John G. Fitch: Seneca's Anapaests: Metre, Colometry, Text and Artistry in the Anapaests of Seneca's Tragedies. (American Classical Studies, 17.) Pp. Ix + 103. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1987. $21.95 ($16 Members Price); Paper $13.95 ($10 Members Price). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 39 (02):391-392.
A. C. Pearson (1911). Powell's Euripides' Phoenissae The Phoenissae of Euripides. Edited, with Introduction and Commentary, by John U. Powell, M.A., Fellow, Tutor, and Classical Lecturer of St. John's College, Oxford. Pp. 229. 8vo., London: Constable and Co., Ltd., 1911. 8s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 25 (06):177-179.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca (2010). Selected Letters. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads1 ( #616,045 of 1,707,756 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #352,633 of 1,707,756 )
How can I increase my downloads?