Berkeley and God in the Quad

Philosophy Compass 7 (6):388-396 (2012)
In a familiar limerick attributed to Ronald Knox, the narrator asks how a “tree/should continue to be/when there’s no one about in the Quad,” and is subsequently reassured that its continuous existence is guaranteed by God’s being “always about in the Quad” observing it. This is meant to capture Berkeley’s so‐called ‘continuity argument’ for the existence of God, on which the claim that objects exist continuously over time is supposed to entail the existence of a Divine Mind that continuously perceives the ideas that constitute those objects. But the continuity argument is not an uncontroversial one. For one thing, we might ask what divine perception is supposed to be like – does God perceive all of the ideas that we do, and in the same way that we do? And if so, does this mean that God perceives pain – that God suffers? For another thing, we might ask whether Berkeley is entitled to the claim that objects exist continuously to begin with. In this paper, I look at some of the problems associated with the continuity argument, and then present a reading of divine perception that attempts to prevent these problems from arising at the outset
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00487.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,217
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Jeffrey K. McDonough (2008). Berkeley, Human Agency and Divine Concurrentism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 567-590.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Melissa Frankel (2016). Berkeley on the “Twofold State of Things”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (1):43-60.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Charles J. McCracken (1979). What Does Berkeley's God See in the Quad? Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (3):280-292.
David Berman (1986). Berkeley's Quad. Idealistic Studies 16 (1):41-45.
Robert McKim (1987). What Is God Doing in the Quad? Philosophy Research Archives 13:637-653.
Marc A. Hight (2007). Berkeley and Bodily Resurrection. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):443-458.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

58 ( #82,380 of 1,940,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #149,734 of 1,940,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.