Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 17:281-290 (2009)
|Abstract||"Does torture work?" is a factual rather than ethical or legal question. But legal and ethical discussions of torture should be informed by knowledge of the answer to the factual question of the reliability of torture as an interrogation technique. The question as to whether torture works should be asked before that of its legal admissibility—if it is not useful to interrogators, there is no point considering its legality in court.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christine E. Gudorf (2011). Feminist Approaches to Religion and Torture. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (4):613-621.
J. Jeremy Wisnewski (2008). It's About Time: Defusing the Ticking Bomb Argument. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):103-116.
Claudia Card (2008). Ticking Bombs and Interrogations. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):1-15.
Darrell Cole (2012). Torture and Just War. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (1):26-51.
Yuval Ginbar (2010). Why Not Torture Terrorists?: Moral, Practical, and Legal Aspects of the 'Ticking Bomb' Justification for Torture. OUP Oxford.
Fritz Allhoff (2003). Terrorism and Torture. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):121-134.
Fritz Allhoff (2005). Terrorism and Torture. In Timothy Shanahan (ed.), Philosophy 9/11: Thinking About the War on Terrorism. Open Court.
Matthew R. Silliman & David Kenneth Johnson (2007). Tortured Ethics. Social Philosophy Today 23:211-222.
Seumas Miller (2005). Is Torture Ever Morally Justifiable? International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):179-192.
Added to index2009-10-01
Total downloads98 ( #6,428 of 549,041 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,186 of 549,041 )
How can I increase my downloads?