David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 24 (1-2):87 - 95 (1972)
I have so far ignored Earman's Section IV in which spatiotemporal coincidence is discussed. The answer will be clear from the preceding: the exact definitions and principles of the exact theories we have displayed are to be discussed with reference to the special and not the general theory of relativity. But moreover, Earman's transition from (C) to (1) assumes what we do not grant: that events are causally connectible exactly if the points in the mathematical space-time at which they are located are linked by a causal curve.This captures in a nutshell my own conclusions. The first is that the causal theory, after its success vis-à-vis the STR, must now provide a detailed analysis of spatiotemporal concepts in the GTR. The second is that the points raised by Earman do not provide substantive reasons for doubting the adequacy of the causal theory to this task, because Earman insists in his extrapolations on a much closer relation between the empirical structure of events and the mathematical structures that model it than ought to be assumed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Adolf Grünbaum (1968). Geometry and Chronometry in Philosophical Perspective. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
Adolf Grünbaum (1970). Space, Time and Falsifiability Critical Exposition and Reply to "a Panel Discussion of Grünbaum's Philosophy of Science". Philosophy of Science 37 (4):469-588.
Wolfgang Pauli (1958). Theory of Relativity. New York, Pergamon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Bas C. van Fraassen (1993). Armstrong, Cartwright, and Earman on Laws and Symmetry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53:431--44.
Igor Douven & Leon Horsten (1998). Earman on Underdetermination and Empirical Indistinguishability. Erkenntnis 49 (3):303-320.
Leon Horsten (1998). Earman on Underdetermination and Empirical Indistinguishability. Erkenntnis 49 (3):303 - 320.
J. M. (2002). Supervenience and (Non-Modal) Reductionism in Leibniz's Philosophy of Time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):793-810.
Ronald C. Hoy (1975). The Role of Genidentity in the Causal Theory of Time. Philosophy of Science 42 (1):11-19.
Wesley C. Salmon (1977). An "at-at" Theory of Causal Influence. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):215-224.
Hugh M. Lacey (1968). The Causal Theory of Time: A Critique of Grünbaum's Version. Philosophy of Science 35 (4):332-354.
Jonathan Tallant (2008). What is It to “B” a Relation? Synthese 162 (1):117 - 132.
John Earman (1972). Notes on the Causal Theory of Time. Synthese 24 (1-2):74 - 86.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1993). Armstrong, Cartwright, and Earman on Laws and Symmetry. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2):431 - 444.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #47,533 of 1,103,010 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #297,567 of 1,103,010 )
How can I increase my downloads?