Fragment answers to questions: a case of inaudible syntax
| Abstract | Speakers often answer a question with what appears to be merely a phrase, a fragment of a sentence, rather than with a full sentence. Merchant (2004) offers an analysis of fragment answers in which the new information/answer is fronted to a clause-peripheral position and the remainder of the sentence is not pronounced. Two written acceptability judgment experiments are reported that tested predictions of this analysis. The first, in English, tested the prediction that clausal fragment answers should only be fully acceptable when the clausal answer is introduced by an overt complementizer (What did May deny? That Josh left.). This is because clauses may front only when an overt complementizer is present (That Josh left, May denied, but not *Josh left, May denied). The second study was conducted in German, a language that does not permit prepositions to be stranded, left behind, when a noun phrase is moved in overt syntactic structures such as questions or topicalizations. Consequently, when the object of a preposition is questioned, only a prepositional phrase fragment answer, not a noun phrase fragment answer, is predicted to be fully acceptable. Both predictions were confirmed. The results support the claim that syntactic structure is present in unpronounced constituents, and tells against theories of syntax that eschew such structures. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesJason Merchant (2005). Fragments and Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6):661 - 738.
Patrick Suppes (1979). Logical Inference in English: A Preliminary Analysis. Studia Logica 38 (4):375 - 391.
Martin Heidegger (1975/1984). Early Greek Thinking. Harper & Row.
Savas Konur (forthcoming). An Event-Based Fragment of First-Order Logic Over Intervals. Journal of Logic, Language and Information.
Sylvain Degeilh & Anne Preller (2005). Efficiency of Pregroups and the French Noun Phrase. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 14 (4).
C. J. Van Alten & J. G. Raftery (1999). The Finite Model Property for the Implicational Fragment of IPC Without Exchange and Contraction. Studia Logica 63 (2):213 - 222.
C. Vermeulen (2001). A Calculus of Substitutions for DPL. Studia Logica 68 (3):357-387.
C. J. van Alten & J. G. Raftery (1999). The Finite Model Property for the Implicational Fragment of IPC Without Exchange and Contraction. Studia Logica 63 (2):213-222.
David Harrah (1961). A Logic of Questions and Answers. Philosophy of Science 28 (1):40-46.
Jan Patočka (2007). Das Innere und die Welt. Studia Phaenomenologica 7:15-70.
Uskali Mäki (2005). Models Are Experiments, Experiments Are Models. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (2):303-315.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads6 ( #145,498 of 549,010 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,010 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
