Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):69-81 (2005)
|Abstract||Olson (1997a) tries to refute the Psychological Approach to personal identity with his Fetus Argument, and Mackie (1999) aims to do the same with the Death Argument. With the help of a suggestion made by Baker (1999), the following discussion shows that these arguments fail. In the process of defending the Psychological Approach, it is made clear exactly what one is and is not committed to as a proponent of the theory|
|Keywords||Death Fetus Metaphysics Personal Identity Psychology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lynne Rudder Baker (1999). What Am I? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):151 - 159.
Anthony L. Brueckner (2005). Branching in the Psychological Approach to Personal Identity. Analysis 65 (288):294-301.
Gerard P. Montague, Personal Identity and Self as Narrative : Formal Identity and Narrative Identity as Two Essential Building Blocks in the Constitution of Self.
Lynne Rudder Baker (1999). What Am I? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):151-159.
Trenton Merricks (2000). Perdurance and Psychological Continuity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):195-199.
Anthony Brueckner (2009). Endurantism and the Psychological Approach to Personal Identity. Theoria 75 (1):28-33.
Eric T. Olson (1997). The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Eric T. Olson (1997). Was I Ever a Fetus? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (1):95-110.
LR Baker, What Am I? (Discussion of Eric T. Olson's 'Was I Ever a Fetus?', Psychological-Continuity View of Personal Identity).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads110 ( #6,506 of 739,559 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #14,975 of 739,559 )
How can I increase my downloads?