David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):480-499 (2011)
Democratic deliberation places the burden of self-governance on its citizens to provide mutual justifying reasons (Gutmann & Thompson, 1996). This article concerns the limiting effect that group identity has on the efficacy of democratic deliberation for equality in education. Under conditions of a powerful majority, deliberation can be repressive and discriminatory. Issues of white flight and race-based admissions serve to illustrate the bias of which deliberation is capable when it fails to substantively take group identity into account. As forms of Gilbert's (1994) plural subjects, identity group members holding the group identity can experience agency as the freedom to believe together with members of their group. I argue that attending to how group members acquire group beliefs through trust is a reasonable accommodation of group identity in deliberation
|Keywords||repression group identity comprehensiveness democratic education deliberative democracy discrimination|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
J. Adler (2002). Belief's Own Ethics. MIT Press.
Amy Gutmann (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Amy Gutmann (2004). Identity in Democracy. Princeton University Press.
Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press.
Thomas Hobbes (1651/2006). Leviathan. Dover Publications.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Scott F. Aikin & J. Caleb Clanton (2010). Developing Group-Deliberative Virtues. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (4):409-424.
Shane Ralston (2010). Dewey and Goodin on the Value of Monological Deliberation. Etica E Politica 12 (1):235-255.
George Vasilev (2013). Preaching to the Choir or Converting the Uninitiated? The Integrative Potential of in-Group Deliberations. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):109-129.
Alex de Waal (1997). Group Identity, Rationality, and the State. Critical Review 11 (2):279-289.
Josè Medina (2003). Identity Trouble: Disidentification and the Problem of Difference. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (6):655-680.
Raimo Tuomela (1992). Group Beliefs. Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
Amanda Keddie (2013). Political Justice, Schooling and Issues of Group Identity. Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-13.
Christopher Woodard (2003). Group-Based Reasons for Action. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):215-229.
Raymond Trevor Bradley (2011). Detecting the Identity Signature of Secret Social Groups: Holographic Processes and the Communication of Member Affiliation. World Futures 66 (2):124-162.
Philip Pettit (2005). Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement):85-105.
Michaele L. Ferguson (2013). Sharing Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Christian List & Philip Pettit (2006). Group Agency and Supervenience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):85-105.
Added to index2010-12-25
Total downloads4 ( #383,052 of 1,700,306 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #362,609 of 1,700,306 )
How can I increase my downloads?