In James Franklin (ed.), Life to the Full: Rights and Social Justice in Australia. Connor Court (2007)
|Abstract||The late twentieth century saw two long-term trends in popular thinking about ethics. One was an increase in relativist opinions, with the “generation of the Sixties” spearheading a general libertarianism, an insistence on toleration of diverse moral views (for “Who is to say what is right? – it’s only your opinion.”) The other trend was an increasing insistence on rights – the gross violations of rights in the killing fields of the mid-century prompted immense efforts in defence of the “inalienable” rights of the victims of dictators, of oppressed peoples, of refugees. The obvious incompatibility of those ethical stances, one anti-objectivist, the other objectivist in the extreme, proved no obstacle to their both being held passionately, often by the same people.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Siegfried Van Duffel (2004). Natural Rights and Individual Sovereignty. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (2):147–162.
John Mahoney (2007). The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development, and Significance. Blackwell Pub..
Rowan Cruft (2004). Rights: Beyond Interest Theory and Will Theory? Law and Philosophy 23 (4):347 - 397.
John Edwards (2006). Rights: Foundations, Contents, Hierarchy. Res Publica 12 (3).
Seumas Miller (2000). Collective Rights and Minority Rights. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):241-257.
Peter Carruthers (1992). The Animals Issue: Moral Theory in Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Terrance McConnell (1984). The Nature and Basis of Inalienable Rights. Law and Philosophy 3 (1):25 - 59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #36,559 of 549,093 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #5,461 of 549,093 )
How can I increase my downloads?