Language and ontology in early chinese thought

Philosophy East and West 57 (4):420-456 (2007)
: This essay critiques Chad Hansen’s "mass noun hypothesis," arguing that though most Classical Chinese nouns do function as mass nouns, this fact does not support the claim that pre-Qin thinkers treat the extensions of common nouns as mereological wholes, nor does it explain why they adopt nominalist semantic theories. The essay shows that early texts explain the use of common nouns by appeal to similarity relations, not mereological relations. However, it further argues that some early texts do characterize the relation between individuals and collections as a mereological relation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2007.0045
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,904
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Jana S. Rošker (2015). Classical Chinese Logic. Philosophy Compass 10 (5):301-309.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

201 ( #6,375 of 1,725,430 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

166 ( #1,339 of 1,725,430 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.