David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
The Mohist Canons are a set of brief statements on a variety of philosophical and other topics by anonymous members of the Mohist school , an influential philosophical, social, and religious movement of China's Warring States period (479-221 B.C.).  Written and compiled most likely between the late 4th and mid 3rd century B.C., the Canons are often referred to as the “later Mohist” or “Neo-Mohist” canons, since they seem chronologically later than the bulk of the Mohist writings, most of which are probably from the mid-5th to the late 4th century. The..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Frank Saunders Jr (2014). Semantics Without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):215-229.
Similar books and articles
A. C. Graham (1978). Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Chaehyun Chong (1999). The Neo-Mohist Conception of Bian (Disputation). Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (1):1-19.
Dan Robins (2012). Mohist Care. Philosophy East and West 62 (1):60-91.
Desheng Zong (2000). Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings. Philosophy East and West 50 (2):208-228.
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J.S. Mill's Canons of Induction: From True Causes to Provisional Ones. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):361-376.
Chris Fraser (2008). The Mohist School. In Bo Mou (ed.), Routledge History of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge
Chris Fraser, More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.
Jane Geaney (1999). Associate Professor of Religion. Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Jane Geaney (1999). A Critique of A.C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons". Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Ian Johnston (2004). The Gongsun Longzi: A Translation and an Analysis of its Relationship to Later Mohist Writings. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (2):271–295.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #117,489 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #231,316 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?