David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
The Mohist Canons are a set of brief statements on a variety of philosophical and other topics by anonymous members of the Mohist school , an influential philosophical, social, and religious movement of China's Warring States period (479-221 B.C.).  Written and compiled most likely between the late 4th and mid 3rd century B.C., the Canons are often referred to as the “later Mohist” or “Neo-Mohist” canons, since they seem chronologically later than the bulk of the Mohist writings, most of which are probably from the mid-5th to the late 4th century. The..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Frank Saunders Jr (2014). Semantics Without Truth in Later Mohist Philosophy of Language. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (2):215-229.
Similar books and articles
A. C. Graham (1978). Later Mohist Logic, Ethics, and Science. School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Chaehyun Chong (1999). The Neo-Mohist Conception of Bian (Disputation). Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (1):1-19.
Dan Robins (2012). Mohist Care. Philosophy East and West 62 (1):60-91.
Desheng Zong (2000). Studies of Intensional Contexts in Mohist Writings. Philosophy East and West 50 (2):208-228.
Steffen Ducheyne (2008). J.S. Mill's Canons of Induction: From True Causes to Provisional Ones. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (4):361-376.
Chris Fraser (2008). The Mohist School. In Bo Mou (ed.), Routledge History of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge
Chris Fraser, More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.
Jane Geaney (1999). Associate Professor of Religion. Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Jane Geaney (1999). A Critique of A.C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons". Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Ian Johnston (2004). The Gongsun Longzi: A Translation and an Analysis of its Relationship to Later Mohist Writings. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31 (2):271–295.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #143,760 of 1,932,568 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #197,690 of 1,932,568 )
How can I increase my downloads?