David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 13 (1) (1992)
Previous papers on ethics consultation in medicine have taken a positivistic approach and lack critical scrutiny of the psychosocial, political, and moral contexts in which consultations occur. This paper discusses some of the contextual factors that require more careful research. We need to know more about what prompts and inhibits consultation, especially what factors effectively prevent house officers and nonphysicians from requesting consultation despite perceived moral conflict in cases. The attitudes and institutional power of attending medical staff seem important, especially where innovative interventions raise ethical questions. Ethics consultants also need to address the thorny problems of the origin(s) of the consultant's authority, whistleblowing, conflicts of interest that affect the consultant, persistently poor communications in hospitals, systemic inequity in the availability or quality of services for some, and the standing of the consultant's recommendations, including their appearance in the patient's medical record.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tom Tomlinson (1999). Ethics Consultant: Problem Solver or Spiritual Counselor? [REVIEW] Human Studies 22 (1):43-52.
Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus (2008). Strangers at the Benchside: Research Ethics Consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
Mark J. Bliton & Stuart G. Finder (1999). Strange, but Not Stranger: The Peculiar Visage of Philosophy in Clinical Ethics Consultation. [REVIEW] Human Studies 22 (1):69-97.
Stella Reiter-Theil (2003). Balancing the Perspectives. The Patient's Role in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):247-254.
George J. Agich (2011). Defense Mechanisms in Ethics Consultation. HEC Forum 23 (4):269-279.
George J. Agich (2009). The Issue of Expertise in Clinical Ethics. Diametros 22:3-20.
Alfred Simon (2009). Quality Standards for Clinical Ethics Consultation. Diametros 22:105 – 115.
Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton (2011). Responsibility After the Apparent End: 'Following-Up' in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Bioethics 25 (7):413-424.
Andrea Frolic (2011). Who Are We When We Are Doing What We Are Doing? The Case for Mindful Embodiment in Ethics Case Consultation. Bioethics 25 (7):370-382.
Barry Hoffmaster (1999). Anatomy of a Clinical Ethics Consultation. Human Studies 22 (1):53-68.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #234,600 of 1,099,910 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #127,115 of 1,099,910 )
How can I increase my downloads?