Graduate studies at Western
Quakers Hill Press (1996)
|Abstract||Why do students take the instruction "prove" in examinations to mean "go to the next question"? Because they have not been shown the simple techniques of how to do it. Mathematicians meanwhile generate a mystique of proof, as if it requires an inborn and unteachable genius. True, creating research-level proofs does require talent; but reading and understanding the proof that the square of an even number is even is within the capacity of most mortals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$8.99 used (41% off) $11.06 new (27% off) $13.50 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
James Franklin (1987). Non-Deductive Logic in Mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):1-18.
Carlo Cellucci (2008). Why Proof? What is a Proof? In Giovanna Corsi & Rossella Lupacchini (eds.), Deduction, Computation, Experiment. Exploring the Effectiveness of Proof, pp. 1-27. Springer.
R. B. J. T. Allenby (1997). Numbers and Proofs. Copublished in North, South, and Central America by John Wiley & Sons Inc..
Andrew Wohlgemuth (1990/2011). Introduction to Proof in Abstract Mathematics. Dover Publications.
P. R. Baxandall (ed.) (1978). Proof in Mathematics ("If", "Then" and "Perhaps"): A Collection of Material Illustrating the Nature and Variety of the Idea of Proof in Mathematics. University of Keele, Institute of Education.
Marian Mrozek & Jacek Urbaniec (1997). Evolution of Mathematical Proof. Foundations of Science 2 (1):77-85.
James Robert Brown (2008). Philosophy of Mathematics: A Contemporary Introduction to the World of Proofs and Pictures. Routledge.
James Franklin (1996). Proof in Mathematics. Quakers Hill Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #17,026 of 738,450 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,450 )
How can I increase my downloads?