David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cognitive Science 36 (4):674-697 (2012)
The effect of prism adaptation on movement is typically reduced when the movement at test (prisms off) differs on some dimension from the movement at training (prisms on). Some adaptation is latent, however, and only revealed through further testing in which the movement at training is fully reinstated. Applying a nonlinear attractor dynamic model (Frank, Blau, & Turvey, 2009) to available data (Blau, Stephen, Carello, & Turvey, 2009), we provide evidence for a causal link between the latent (or secondary) aftereffect and an additive force term that is known to account for symmetry breaking. The evidence is discussed in respect to the hypothesis that recalibration aftereffects reflect memory principles (encoding specificity, transfer-appropriate processing) oriented to time-translation invariance—when later testing conserves the conditions of earlier training. Forgetting or reduced adaptation effects follow from the loss of this invariance and are reversed by its reinstatement
|Keywords||Symmetry breaking Nonlinear modeling Prism adaptation Latent aftereffect|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Stephen E. Robbins (2008). Semantic Redintegration: Ecological Invariance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):726-727.
Stephen E. Robbins (2002). Semantics, Experience and Time. Cognitive Systems Research 3 (3):301-337.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alexandre Laforgue (1993). Les Brisures de Symetrie du Temps. Acta Biotheoretica 41 (1-2):105-117.
Alexandre Laforgue (1994). Les Brisures de Symetrie du Temps. Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):105-117.
Randolph Blake, Duje Tadin, Kenith V. Sobel, Tony A. Raissian & Sang Chul Chong (2006). Strength of Early Visual Adaptation Depends on Visual Awareness. Pnas Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (12):4783-4788.
Chuang Liu (2003). Classical Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1219-1232.
J. T. Wiebes (1982). L'adaptation Evolutive. Acta Biotheoretica 31 (4):239-243.
Chuang Liu (1996). Gauge Invariance, Cauchy Problem, Indeterminism, and Symmetry Breaking. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):79.
Leo A. Goodman, Statistical Magic and/or Statistical Serendipity: An Age of Progress in the Analysis of Categorical Data.
Leigh Van Valen (2009). How Ubiquitous is Adaptation? A Critique of the Epiphenomenist Program. Biology and Philosophy 24 (2):267-280.
John Earman (2004). Laws, Symmetry, and Symmetry Breaking: Invariance, Conservation Principles, and Objectivity. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1227--1241.
John Earman (2004). Laws, Symmetry, and Symmetry Breaking: Invariance, Conservation Principles, and Objectivity. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1227-1241.
Simon A. Cole, Toward Evidence-Based Evidence: Supporting Forensic Knowledge Claims in the Post-Daubert Era.
G. K. Humphrey & Melvyn A. Goodale (1998). Probing Unconscious Visual Processing with the Mccollough Effect. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (3):494-519.
Added to index2012-01-19
Total downloads25 ( #150,152 of 1,792,912 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #102,276 of 1,792,912 )
How can I increase my downloads?