David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Research 18:25-36 (1993)
Thomas Nagel contends that facts regarding the qualitative character of conscious experience can be grasped from only a single point of view. This feature, he claims, is what renders conscious experience subjective in character, and it is what makes facts about the qualitative experience subjective facts. While much has been written regarding the ontological implications of the ‘point of view account’ relatively Iittle has been said on whether the account itself successfully defines the subjectivity of the mental. In this paper, I show that considerations of what can be grasped from only a single point of view provide neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for subjective experience
|Keywords||Epistemology Experience Knowledge Subjective|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John I. Biro (2006). A Point of View on Points of View. Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):3-12.
Michael Tye (1986). The Subjective Qualities of Experience. Mind 95 (January):1-17.
Uriah Kriegel (2005). Naturalizing Subjective Character. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):23-57.
Matthew Soteriou (2005). The Subjective View of Experience and its Objective Commitments. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):177-190.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #59,400 of 1,100,084 )
Recent downloads (6 months)9 ( #28,001 of 1,100,084 )
How can I increase my downloads?