Two caricatures, I: Pascal's Wager

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 44 (2):109 - 114 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pascal’s wager and Leibniz’s theory that this is the best of all possible worlds are latecomers in the Faith-and-Reason tradition. They have remained interlopers; they have never been taken as seriously as the older arguments for the existence of God and other themes related to faith and reason.

Similar books and articles

Pascal's Wager is a possible bet (but not a very good one): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116.
On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
369 (#51,633)

6 months
53 (#76,829)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Franklin
University of New South Wales

Citations of this work

Two caricatures, II: Leibniz's best world.J. Franklin - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (1):45-56.
Pascal’s wager and the origins of decision theory: decision-making by real decision-makers.James Franklin - 2018 - In Paul F. A. Bartha & Lawrence Pasternack (eds.), Pascal’s Wager. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 27-44.
Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.
Pascal's wager.Michael Rota - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (4):e12404.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references