The Limitations of Ritual Propriety: Ritual and Language in Xúnzǐ and Zhuāngzǐ
Sophia (Browse Results) (forthcoming)
| Abstract | Abstract This essay examines the theory of ritual propriety presented in the Xúnzǐ and criticisms of Xunzi-like views found in the classical Daoist anthology Zhuāngzǐ . To highlight the respects in which the Zhuāngzǐ can be read as posing a critical response to a Xunzian view of ritual propriety, the essay juxtaposes the two texts' views of language, since Xunzi's theory of ritual propriety is intertwined with his theory of language. I argue that a Zhuangist critique of the presuppositions of Xunzi's stance on language also undermines his stance on ritual propriety. Xunzi contends that state promulgation of anelaborate code of ritual propriety is a key to good social order ( zhi ) and that state regulation of language is a key to smooth communication and thus also good order. The Zhuāngzǐ provides grounds for doubting both contentions. Claiming that ritual propriety causally produces social order is analogous to claiming that grammar causally produces smooth linguistic communication, when in fact it is more likely our ability to communicate that allows us to develop shared rules of grammar. Humans have fundamental social and communicative capacities that undergird our abilities to speak a language or engage in shared ritual performances. It is these more fundamental capacities, not their manifestation in a particular system of grammar or ritual norms, that provide the root explanation of our ability to communicate or to live together harmoniously. The Xunzi-Zhuangzi dialectic suggests that ritual is indispensable, but normatively justified rituals will be less rigid, less comprehensive, less fastidious, and more spontaneous than a Xunzian theorist would allow. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-26 DOI 10.1007/s11841-012-0303-7 Authors Chris Fraser, Department of Philosophy, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Journal Sophia Online ISSN 1873-930X Print ISSN 0038-1527 | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBjorn Merker (2006). Ritual Pathology and the Nature of Ritual Culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):624-625.
Hahm Chaibong (2001). Confucian Rituals and the Technology of the Self: A Foucaultian Interpretation. Philosophy East and West 51 (3):315-324.
Andrew L. Roth (1995). "Men Wearing Masks": Issues of Description in the Analysis of Ritual. Sociological Theory 13 (3):301-327.
Jiang Tao (2011). Two Notions of Freedom in Classical Chinese Thought: The Concept of Hua 化 in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (4):463-486.
Candace Storey Alcorta & Richard Sosis (2006). Why Ritual Works: A Rejection of the by-Product Hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):613-614.
Bryan R. Warnick (2009). Ritual, Imitation and Education in R. S. Peters. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):57-74.
Kurtis Hagen (2003). Artifice and Virtue in the Xunzi. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):85-107.
Shiyou Zhan (2007). Cultivation (Jiaohua, 教化): The Goal of Xunzi's Ethical Thought. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (1):25-49.
Douglas A. Marshall (2002). Behavior, Belonging, and Belief: A Theory of Ritual Practice. Sociological Theory 20 (3):360-380.
James Harold (2011). Is Xunzi's Virtue Ethics Susceptible to the Problem of Alienation? Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):71-84.
Gregory Nagy (2007). The Fire Ritual of the Iguvine Tables: Facing a Central Problem in the Study of Ritual Language. Classical World 100 (2).
Andrew Komasinski (2011). Maybe Happiness is Loving Our Fathers: Clarifying Confucius. In Nease Ron & Austin Michael (eds.), Fatherhood and Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kurtis Hagen (2010). The Propriety of Confucius: A Sense-of-Ritual. Asian Philosophy 20 (1):1 – 25.
Daniel M. Johnson (2012). Social Morality and Social Misfits: Confucius, Hegel, and the Attack of Zhuangzi and Kierkegaard. Asian Philosophy 22 (4):365-374.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-04-07Total downloads5 ( #160,204 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
